this post was submitted on 31 Aug 2025
1400 points (98.7% liked)

Technology

74692 readers
2756 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Dremor@lemmy.world -5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There are a lot of very good Bluetooth headphones from Bose, Sony, and the like. If you take a look at lab tests, most of lf them got a frequency response pretty close to the ideal curve, and ANC helps a lot to isolate outside noises that would drown out the music on wired headphones.

But I do agree about choice, just not on the blind refusal of using USB-C adapters. That's unfortunate that they removed it, but it has some good reasons. A headphone jack wasn't made to be waterproof, and if some managed to make some of them waterproof-ish, it is often by enclosing it into its own little sub-enclosure, with a good short-circuit protection (because even a tiny water drop in there mean a short), both of which takes place.
Same goes for the DAC, we got so far into miniaturizing it, and inside interferences are so high now with new technologies, it probably wouldn't be viable anymore to have it inside the phone itself. Even larger device, like the Steam Deck, have problems preventing interferences on the headphones jack, so that must be an even bigger problem on something as tinny as a phone ๐Ÿ˜…

[โ€“] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

citing bose and sony vs sennheiser audeze and beyerdynamics, dude, you don't know headphones

[โ€“] Dremor@lemmy.world -5 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

I trust in independent reviews, reproducible tests and hard numbers, not in brand cultivated images and subjective choices. I don't care if it comes for Audeze, Sony, or a Chinese Knockoff, numbers doesn't lie.

[โ€“] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 2 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

did... did you just call sennheiser a chinese knockoff? dude, know when to bow out

[โ€“] Dremor@lemmy.world 0 points 11 hours ago

Hell no. I'm well aware it is a good audio brand (german I think, but may be mistaken)

What I wanted to say here is that I prefer an objective good quality product, adapted to my needs, to a brand name. Even well known brands sometimes make bad products.

As an example, I have a Sony WH-1000XM3. But if I'd be interested in an XM4, there is no way in hell I'd buy an XM5, because of some shitty choices they took (no more foldable design, forced adaptative ANC). Maybe the XM6 will end up of interest to me, I did not yet check its specs, but considering I recently changed my current XM3 battery, I won't be back on the market until the XM7 or XM8.

[โ€“] xep@discuss.online 5 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

Could you show us the frequency response for the Bose vs the LCD-5s and tell us why you prefer the Bose?