this post was submitted on 03 Sep 2025
40 points (97.6% liked)

Selfhosted

51260 readers
431 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
ruud@lemmy.world
Loki@lemmy.world
CannaVet@lemmy.world
devve@lemmy.world
HybridSarcasm@lemmy.world
HybridSarcasm@lemmy.hybridsarcasm.xyz
40
[Help] My first serious self hosted server (sh.itjust.works)
submitted 5 days ago by TechyTochy@sh.itjust.works to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world
21 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Hello, I managed to get my hands on a second hand Proliant HPE server that I want to turn into a media server for myself (possibly family too).

I also have a bunch of drivers lying around in all different sizes. I want a good balance of security, backup and flexibility for the future. So hear my plan out:

  • Running Ubuntu server LTS on SAS 600gb disks (now it's in raid5 array with 3 identical disks but I probably want to change that and take out some disks from it for my data)
  • hardware raid 0 on the various single disks (with HPE smart array)
  • mergerfs and snapraid for a "raid" and backup (I read some information about it and I think for my use is the best option)
  • Headscale VPN (basically Foss tailscale implementation) for remote connection and mesh network
  • Docker with all apps

I'm no expert on servers or RAIDs or HPE. What do you think? I'm mostly worried about the hardware raid 0 + Snapraid, is it doable?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] HeyJoe@lemmy.world 12 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Thankfully, we never lost data, but we have had the controller die a few times through the years on a few servers before. Thankfully we had great support and the part was same day delivered to us to replace and the 2nd time was a Dell server which we also get the part same day and a tech to come replace it for us.

We avoided buying servers with this going forward. At this point, we really only have VM's and only a handful of physical servers anymore, so it's not even a concern.

[–] TechyTochy@sh.itjust.works 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I read online that the controller failure is a thing and not that uncommon. I really don’t want to rely on HP hardware tbh.

[–] bluGill@fedia.io 12 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Parts fail all the time. The problem with hardware raid is you need a compatible controller or none of the data can be read even though it is still on the physical disks. Computer hardware is often only made for a few months before there is a new model and so you are risking that the manufacture really made the new model work with what you have. That is assuming the manufacture doesn't go out of business which could happen without warning. \

Also, if hardware breaks that is often a good excuse to replace it - odds are better hardware is available for the same price and sometimes a lot less $ - with hardware raid you are stuck paying whatever price they charge.

[–] TechyTochy@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 days ago

Got it, thanks! Yes for my personal use I rather not rely on HP hardware at all and disable the whole raid thing entirely.