this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2025
38 points (93.2% liked)
Australia
4673 readers
311 users here now
A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.
Before you post:
If you're posting anything related to:
- The Environment, post it to Aussie Environment
- Politics, post it to Australian Politics
- World News/Events, post it to World News
- A question to Australians (from outside) post it to Ask an Australian
If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News
Rules
This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:
- When posting news articles use the source headline and place your commentary in a separate comment
Banner Photo
Congratulations to @Tau@aussie.zone who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition
Recommended and Related Communities
Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:
- Australian News
- World News (from an Australian Perspective)
- Australian Politics
- Aussie Environment
- Ask an Australian
- AusFinance
- Pictures
- AusLegal
- Aussie Frugal Living
- Cars (Australia)
- Coffee
- Chat
- Aussie Zone Meta
- bapcsalesaustralia
- Food Australia
- Aussie Memes
Plus other communities for sport and major cities.
https://aussie.zone/communities
Moderation
Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.
Additionally, we have our instance admins: @lodion@aussie.zone and @Nath@aussie.zone
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Some people I know who supported the march do so because they're upset at the upcoming spare/unused bedroom tax, which aims to bring more homes on the market to lower prices. They don't care about housing people, they care about profit.
I'm also not convinced cutting immigration would help at all when it would only discourage construction, which is already below what's needed to support birthrate + people moving in from rural areas. Immigration isn't the cause of the crisis, so cutting it isn't the solution.
Australia built 180,000 homes in 2024
Australia's immigration numbers were around 500,000 over the same period.
But no, that totally doesn't have any negative impact on housing affordability. /s
You seem to be under the impression that we will just magically build and build if people are gone, but that's not realistic. My point was that reducing immigration would significantly cut the number of houses built under the current housing market. We may be building too few homes now, but I doubt much at all will be built after cutting immigration either.
The problem is not that we have a housing market that's too big, it's that we have a broken market. Housing entering the market in this country may be insufficient when demand is high, but it's straight up not entering the market where demand is low, and housing prices are higher than ever everywhere. We need to figure out why the market is broken and fix that if we even want so see housing prices stabilise for an extended period, let alone fall. Reducing immigration is a distraction at best.
The number of people coming in to the country is FAR exceeding our ability to build. The first thing we need to do is reduce our intake (reduce demand) so we can catch up. I'm not saying we need to stop ALL immigration, just that right now, reducing immigration is one of the few levers we have to help alleviate the crisis. Then we can talk about removing Negative Gearing and Capital Gains Tax Concessions, maybe even put some limits on property investing.
What would you say are limiting factors on our ability to build then, if you think reducing immigration won't significantly reduce housing construction?
Why do you say immigration a lever to pull but not the factors limiting construction?
The limiting factor is government red-tape. It costs a lot of money and can take years just to get the approvals to start building.
Not to mention our whole tax system is geared to favor the rich. (Thanks Howard!)
I do agree with that, I suppose we probably disagree with the speed reforms can take then.