this post was submitted on 05 Sep 2025
269 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

77096 readers
4026 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] baggachipz@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 months ago (5 children)

They’ve raised $32 billion total. Does it still sound sane?

[–] Botzo@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (4 children)

5B run rate explains the wild 183B valuation better. The calculus is usually a solid return after 3 years and double or better by 5, so they're being on something like a 500B valuation by 2030.

And they very likely won't be profitable in the real sense even then.

[–] baggachipz@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 months ago (3 children)

The $5B run rate, as I understand it, is smoke and mirrors. Each dollar they make costs them much more than that dollar. Sell it at a loss, but make it up on volume!

Something something efficiency

The models are only getting more expensive to train and run as they increase in complexity.

[–] silasmariner@programming.dev 1 points 3 months ago

What we lose on sales we make up for in volume

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)