silasmariner
It's not though. There are some situations where you shouldn't 'give', and others where you shouldn't 'take'. This is one of the former cases he is correct.
I think it's probably just framed that way because Russia never officially took responsibility for it, not because anyone believes Ukraine really did it
Batshit doomerism, you sound like one of those religious nuts expecting the rapture any minute. You don't have some privileged insight into 'how bad things are gonna get' or whatever hypothetical revolution you've conjectured, yet you presume to lecture others about it. Please, tell me again about narcissism and what it consists of.
I guess you had a pretty unpleasant life so far? Not everybody's has sucked. But I don't think I need to form a coherent argument against 'all reproduction is inherently morally bankrupt ' - it's such deliberate bait that it rejects good faith discussion off-hand.
Is there a more coherent argument to be made against hyper-natalists? Yes, I think that could plausibly be upheld. But that would be a more nuanced stance. The world, despite its trajectory, is not a hellscape.
Absolutely unhinged
They got the punctuation all mixed up. Instead of 'Windows 10 will be the last ever version! No more major upgrades!' it was meant to read 'Windows 10 will be the last ever version? No! More major upgrades!'
Unfortunate mistake
Ah, a homestuck fan perhaps?
Maybe worried about looking personally identifiable. It's understandable.
Which is weird because if you're actually trying to get shit done, you get much more value out of someone with experience in your ecosystem than someone you've just hired, and it's astonishing how low you an keep those ppls salaries compared to new hires who're much less effective. Hire+fire is shit for everyone. Except, I guess, idiots who can only think 2 months in either direction.
Only if you believed his bollocks, which we all know is not to be believed