this post was submitted on 12 Sep 2025
173 points (93.0% liked)

Ask Lemmy

34471 readers
1157 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I constantly see that the current US Supreme Court makes inconstitucional rulings like for example, allowing racial profiling.

For what little I've gathered due to separation of powers. The supreme court is just a designated authority. Why hasn't there been any movement that just aims to de-legitimize the current supreme Court?

Why can't a judge say "I denounce the Supreme courts authority for their failing to uphold the spirit of the law and now I shall follow this other courts rulings"?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago (2 children)

You can withdraw your consent to be ruled and state officials can press their claims.

Then the question is "Who wins?"

I would ask the good people of Palestine how that goes.

[–] hector@lemmy.today 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Not a fair comparison. Palestinians are holed up into ghettos, everything in or out controlled and overwhelming indiscriminate force being applied at any provokation real or constructed by the state or their paramilitary settlers.

Consent does not play into palestine's situation anymore than it did with rezidents of the warsaw ghetto.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Palestinians are holed up into ghettos, everything in or out controlled and overwhelming indiscriminate force being applied at any provokation real or constructed by the state or their paramilitary settlers.

They're farther down the rabbit hole than we are. But we're all moving in the same direction.

[–] BussyGyatt@feddit.org 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

It's the kind of thing that's worth doing regardless of the probability of success. I also don't think much of the comparison between palestine and america.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It’s the kind of thing that’s worth doing regardless of the probability of success

I strongly disagree. What you're proposing is either a toothless protest that gets a whole lot of people arrested, assaulted, and killed. Or a militant insurgency that gets even more people killed.

I also don’t think much of the comparison between palestine and america

ADL’s US-Israel Police Exchanges Militarize the Police

[–] BussyGyatt@feddit.org 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

yeah, well, the problem is I think that not forming some sort of effective resistance constitutes complicity. i'd rather be damned for what I do than what I didn't do, personally.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I think that not forming some sort of effective resistance constitutes complicity

To some degree, sure. But then you might as well say the same of Ukrainians living in occupied Russian territory. "Oh, you should have just fought harder" is more a cavalier one-liner than a political perspective.

I think we're witnessing a certain amount of survivorship bias. The folks who are "complicit" are often just the people remaining after rebellious groups were quashed or driven away.

[–] BussyGyatt@feddit.org 1 points 2 days ago

“Oh, you should have just fought harder” is more a cavalier one-liner than a political perspective.

that's a hard point i'll give you that one, that's a stumper. it's a bit of a caricature, but it's also a reasonable reflection of my position. i really do think people need to stand up and fight but i'll be goddamned if I know what that even begins to look like here, let alone how to tell people to start laying down their lives for a cause.