Selfhosted

51417 readers

683 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.
No spam posting.
Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.
Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.
Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).
No trolling.

Resources:

selfh.st Newsletter and index of selfhosted software and apps
awesome-selfhosted software
awesome-sysadmin resources
Self-Hosted Podcast from Jupiter Broadcasting

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

HybridSarcasm@lemmy.world

HybridSarcasm@lemmy.hybridsarcasm.xyz

Simplify home hardware for selfhosting (lemmy.zip)

submitted 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) by lIlIllIlIIIllIlIlII@lemmy.zip to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world

24 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Right now I have a NAS running 24/7 for some self hosted apps (p2p, *arr...) and as primary storage for my multimedia files.

This NAS has some limitations because it has a low spec hardware and the OS is "propietary", so sometimes I have issues with docker or I miss some random feature that "standard" Linux distros have.

I work in IT and deal with the technology at home sometimes feels like a second job. I'm thinking that maybe I could simplify my home hardware avoiding NAS servers and use only my main desktop running 24/7 . This could give me a lot of flexibility (a standard OS, VMs, standard docker, better hardware, faster file operations because no LAN involved...) and less hardware to deal with.

Does anybody went this way? Any recommendations in favor or against it?

Sorry for my english.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 19 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

im a firm believer in task appropriate stuff.. 24/7 server apps should be on a dedicated server box.. network storage should only perform storage tasks. i wouldnt use a primary workstation also as server cuz i want to do crazy shit on my workstation. i wouldnt ever want to interfere with my 'production' stuff on the server.

ive been quite happy running a headless server and various nas boxes for storage redundancy.. my home related i.t. tasks are very minimal now that everything is solidly automated.

[–] bobs_monkey@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 hour ago

Absolutely agree. My DD distro accidentally gets borked sometimes as fiddling can go too far, and it's become essential that it doesn't interfere with services my wife uses (file storage, movies/tv, etc). Plus, if everything was going down every so often, she'd probably start looking at me twice for the money I've invested in my server rack.

I have one box running TrueNas Core as a straight file server only, and another box running Proxmox for applications plus VMs for projects, as well as network gear and a surveillance NVR. Thankfully, she never sees the power bill. But, this way everything keeps humming and I don't get an earful.