this post was submitted on 14 Sep 2025
103 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

75162 readers
1580 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
L4s@hackingne.ws
103
ClockBench: Even the best AI models can't reliably read the clock (clockbench.ai)
submitted 1 day ago by Pro@programming.dev to c/technology@lemmy.world
8 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

cross-posted from: https://programming.dev/post/37407786

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] SnoringEarthworm@sh.itjust.works 6 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

This seems like a dumb benchmark.

ClockBench evaluates whether models can read analog clocks - a task that is trivial for humans, but current frontier models struggle with.

What do you mean trivial? Most humans I know can't read the most basic white-background-big-black-numbers clocks.

Someone rigged the jury to get 90% on this:

[โ€“] MCasq_qsaCJ_234@lemmy.zip 1 points 17 hours ago

Rather, ClockBench will end up improving AI in this regard over the next few years. This is because they need any AI benchmark to identify its strengths and weaknesses in order to improve it in future versions.