this post was submitted on 16 Sep 2025
759 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

75227 readers
3469 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 290 points 1 day ago (11 children)

At the risk of agreeing with Reddit:

Under new rules rolling out over the coming months, a small number of users will be required to leave some of their moderator posts so that they aren’t moderating more than five subreddits with 100,000 monthly visitors.

That sounds perfectly reasonable. Reddit has a massive powermod problem.

[–] randomblock1@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago

This was desperately needed.

But I'm not convinced they aren't just going to make alts.

[–] tabular@lemmy.world 139 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Given Reddit's past unreasonableness, I wouldn't be surprised if this otherwise reasonable explanation has an alternative motive.

[–] db2@lemmy.world 77 points 1 day ago (3 children)
[–] krunklom@lemmy.zip 54 points 1 day ago

While ulterior is probably a better way to say that alternative motive also makes sense given the context.

[–] tabular@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Thanks, I wanted to say that but I couldn't figure out how to spell it.

[–] db2@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

That's what I guessed. Alternative is a fine alternative word though.

[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 40 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The motive is these mods hold a decent amount of power on the platform that they wish to reduce. They don’t want a repeat of the API protests.

[–] interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Now /u/spez will have all the power

[–] jballs@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 day ago

Yeah that is exactly it. They didn't want mods to be able to disrupt the site again, so they're looking to make that more difficult.

God, I am so glad I left that place.

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Gotta boost user numbers.

Or obscure them considering not letting people see sub count only daily/weekly activities

[–] ronl2k@lemmy.world 1 points 23 hours ago

The user numbers were bogus anyway since Reddit didn't automatically decrement the user number after banning a member. The banned member had to manually unjoin the subreddit. So the membership count was inflated with banned members.

[–] pimento64@sopuli.xyz 6 points 1 day ago

That's it. It's the illusion of fairness and it takes away reddit jannies' ability to show off their powermod status, and that's the only incentive they have not to use sockpuppets for every sub they mod.

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This is actually another of Reddit's decisions that I'm in agreement with. Subscriber count isn't a very useful number, it largely just measures how old a subreddit is. You can already see how old the subreddit is much more accurately by looking at its founding date.

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 1 day ago

If they'd added, yes. But removing it completely is just a way to hide how many are on the platform.

Or left in a protest

[–] Skavau@piefed.social 39 points 1 day ago (3 children)

True, but Reddit let this problem fester for a long time.

What's interesting to me here regarding this, is Reddits current preparation timescale. This isn't going to be enforced until March 31st, 2026. This tells me that Reddit would have been unprepared for a complete mass-walkout of community moderators during the 2023 Reddit API strikes. A large chunk of Reddit during that period was genuinely inaccessible. But after a few token gestures and a few examples made of some especially rebellious mod-teams, most of the striking moderators returned.

A huge opportunity was missed by people running major communities to functionally degrade Reddit in at least the medium-term as a website. You can't just hastily promote random people to replace moderators Reddit is either forced to remove or who leave voluntarily. The average person is likely too lazy, too arbitrary and too corrupt to effectively oversee communities of notable sizes.

[–] Yaztromo@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I was on one of those “especially rebellious mod-teams”. We were even interviewed by Ars Technica about it all at the time.

On advice of a majority of our users, we took our sub offline and kept it that way until Reddit booted us as mods. Honestly, this was the outcome I was expecting — hell, I was pretty open about goading them into it. What was the alternative — to cave to the platform that was abusing us so I could keep working for them for free?

That’s the part I didn’t understand about my fellow mods from other subs. Many of them caved pretty quickly. Their identities seemed to be so tied up in being a Reddit mod that they couldn’t let it go, even though the relationship was obviously very unequal. Too many other people stood up after witnessing the mod abuse to take over from those who got the boot, just asking for the Reddit boot to be applied to their necks instead.

Well, I wish all the mods the kind of treatment they forgave/ignored the last time around.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

at least you wernt like that anti-work mod that went ON FOX, that actually drew negative attention to the site.

[–] Yaztromo@lemmy.world 2 points 22 hours ago

I have way too much self-respect to ever show my face on FOX 🤣.

[–] Fredthefishlord@lemmy.blahaj.zone 25 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The quality of reddit took a massive hit after the strike and never recovered.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 11 points 1 day ago

it took another one from the series of purges this year too. i think the purges did alot more damage than reddit is letting on. since they were doing it for months on end, i was seeing a real decrease in users posting, and mostly it was replaced by bot posting.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

actually, thier purges since the election was too effective, and removed so much users and mods by banning them. plus the shadowbans have dramatically increased, because they made the filters to sensitive to "potential bots/spammers). 50/50 irl users/bots. at least right now, its reddit is filled with charlie kirk propaganda(negative and positive), with a little hint of luigi.

[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 26 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That was my reaction too. I don’t feel like digging in to see if it’s actually bad though. Not gonna affect my life.

Its probably related to the whole paying users thing.

[–] GreenShimada@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago (1 children)

We all presume that being the mod of several large reddit communities doesn't include the possibility of sidehustle financial benefits.

Yet, humans are innovators of corruption! And I can only assume that any multi-mega-subreddit moderator has worked out something to make what is obviously a full time job worth their time.

[–] Euphoma@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 day ago

I heard mods of big subreddits can get basically sponsored by big companies and go to events. Half the pc gaming subreddits have what are basically ad posts pinned by the mods.

[–] Broken@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 day ago

It could be viewed as reasonable if viewed alone. I think that its fine and could make a lot of sense for control over their platform.

The history of reddit sheds a different context in my mind though. Mods are volunteers. Subreddits were established to moderate themselves, implementing nuanced rules for their specific topics that might differ from other subs that need completely different rules and approaches. Its part of what made reddit unique compared to alternate sites.

Then they made moderating much more difficult by eliminating third party apps. Then they started implementing their plans to take the platform where they wanted it, which is fine because its their platform, but they wanted all their mods to do a bunch of work and in a certain manner to make it so. Very demanding on free labor.

So there's mods still around and they want to restrict them more? Who knows, maybe that's a great idea but they made the mess they're in. This decision isn't a single on on its own, its part of a stack of them.

[–] Fyrnyx@kbin.melroy.org 5 points 1 day ago

Yeah. I mean, I remembered seeing someone named awkwardturtle on there and they moderated like some 30+ subreddits? That's ridiculous.

Users like that should not have that much power.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The problem with powermod isn't that they exist, though. Moderation of a large sub is still done by volunteers that have had to hack solutions together because they don't get a lot of support from Reddit. It helps Reddit to have experienced mods overseeing several subs because they bring with them experience on how to handle high profile and large scale moderation efforts. They are a technical talent pool that Reddit relies upon a lot.

The problem is that Reddit has shitty mod governance. It still uses rank by add date and offers no ability for users to kick a mod out except for TOS faults. Reddit doesn't want to fix mod governance issues because it creates a legitimate mod power structure and Reddit doesn't want to give that much power to users, including mods.

That said, Reddit's shitty mod governance was copied directly to Lemmy.

[–] Auth@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Not really. The powermods arent bringing anything unique moderation except a network that allows them to control content for a specific audience. This is not about enforcing subreddit rules its about subreddit mods pushing an agenda across their subs and pushing sponsored posts outsides reddits ad program.

Its overall a good thing but the powermods will be replaced with reddit admins doing the ame

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The powermods arent bringing anything unique moderation except a network that allows them to control content for a specific audience.

It depends who. There are some that build tools and procedures for handling large forums. They may also share best practices across different subs.

As for controlling content, it isn't like a corporation or political group can't create 20 accounts and take over subs. That's already happened on Reddit.

Its overall a good thing but the powermods will be replaced with reddit admins doing the ame

Or sock puppet accounts. Banning the current set of mods without a plan on who replaces them doesn't fix the problem.

[–] Auth@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

They can still share tools and best practices but now they cant be involved in the post to post moderation.

As for controlling content, it isn’t like a corporation or political group can’t create 20 accounts and take over subs. That’s already happened on Reddit.

You cant do this if the mods are already doing this because the mods will remove the posts. Giving them a huge block of control over a majority of the content on the platform.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

it allows them to institute changes ordered by the admins more effectively, complicitly. hard to do it if 500+ subs had thier own mod team, instead of just 92.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 2 points 1 day ago

reddit might want AI to control some of the subs, dont you think?

[–] interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Yes, but they are also doing this to deleverage their mods and consolidate censorship power with corporate

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

admins actually are the one that hold all the power on the site, mods are the plebs that have to play ball. admins are only 2nd in power to spez. they are the ones behind the aggressive somewhat indiscriminate shadowbans and purges. its only a matter of time before they drop the mask and increasing more right leaning content.

[–] ronl2k@lemmy.world -2 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

Mods get to control the political narrative of their subreddits by banning those with opposing views. That makes them more powerful than admins. As an example, Reddit has been so flooded with pro-trans mods that it's almost impossible to make an anti-trans agenda post in most subreddits without being banned.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 1 points 12 hours ago

except it ultimately falls to the admins which institute all these changes, and filters to the site. mods are just patsies, yea there are problematic mods, and this at the behest of spez too.

[–] ein_zehntel_ruhm@feddit.org 1 points 20 hours ago

You may or may not be right, but that example is apocalyptically bad (and probably betrays that you're not worth talking to, if it reflects your "opinion"), because, ya know, most people with even a slither of empathy within them realize that "making an anti-trans agenda post" is just being a despicable piece of shit. Which would make the mods banning that behavior kinda based.

[–] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

It would have made sense if done years ago. Doing it now is suspicious.