this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2025
114 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

75258 readers
3328 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.zip/post/48958993

energy density of 175 Wh/kg

CATL explained that sodium-ion batteries have slightly lower energy density than lithium-ion batteries but provide distinct advantages in low-temperature performance, carbon footprint, and safety.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] davidgro@lemmy.world 42 points 9 hours ago (3 children)

I really hate how all these headlines give battery capacity as a distance, as though that was a meaningful measure or allowed comparing different technologies.

[–] interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml 1 points 19 minutes ago* (last edited 9 minutes ago)

kWh/kg female dogs !

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

It’s a ballpark number. It says to me “competitive with LiIon on capacity though not beating it yet.”

[–] Theoriginalthon@lemmy.world 15 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

But it's all stupid people and marketing people understand more=better cheaper=better. I think it's why ev adoption has been so poor, questions I get asked are what's the range like? Doesn't it take forever to charge? And aren't they really expensive?

[–] MeowWeHaveAProblem@toast.ooo 5 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

They do the same thing with grid storage batteries and I hate it. "Our battery lasts 20 hours!" Think it was a better unit like watts per 4 hours but media and marketing mess with it.

[–] Holytimes@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

People understand time.

People have no fucking idea how much their crap uses. So giving the watthour is literally pointless.

It's a nice statistic to have.

But for cars, giving a cars range in watthours is like saying the road trip is 8.3 gallons of gas.

JUST TELL ME HOW LONG IT WILL TAKE TO GET THERE OR HOW FAR IT IS.

[–] gloktawasright@lemmy.world 1 points 52 minutes ago

I think the issue in this case is that the range of this specific car and battery doesn’t convey the impact of the battery innovation. If they gave an example of the range with that car and battery size using current battery tech to demonstrate the improvement, I think that would be more helpful.