Technology
Which posts fit here?
Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.
Post guidelines
[Opinion] prefix
Opinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title.
Rules
1. English only
Title and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original link
Post URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communication
All communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. Inclusivity
Everyone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacks
Any kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangents
Stay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may apply
If something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.
Companion communities
!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip
Icon attribution | Banner attribution
If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.
view the rest of the comments
The title and the article don’t match, like…..at all. The article states that all the biggest companies absolutely can state and show how AI is extremely useful to them.
They did not say what the biggest companies use the AI for.
Article said companies in the server supply chain are happy, and that executives are happy, and some companies not using LLMs have actual use cases, but that's it.
It didn’t say anything about companies in the “server supply chain” being happy. It also said……well not much really. Nothing that could support the title.
Are you talking about this line?
Are you saying that you don't know what these companies use AI for?
No. What I'm asking is if this is the line you were referring to. I wasn't sure. If it is, these companies have a vested interest in "extolling AI's benefits". But if you're not talking about this line, I don't want to jump to conclusions. That's why I asked.
I'm referring to the fact that they specifically exclude the biggest companies because they know they can state and show what they use AI for and how it benefits them.
Did they put that information in their filings? Because that was the analysis. I don't know if they did or didn't. If they did, then your assertion would be correct. If they didn't though, it would not be correct.