this post was submitted on 24 Sep 2025
152 points (93.7% liked)

Selfhosted

60093 readers
964 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam.

  3. Posts here are to be centered around self-hosting. Please ensure it is clear in your post how it relates to self-hosting.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or git here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title.

  6. No trolling.

  7. Promotion posts require your active participation in selfhosting or related communities, or the post will be removed. No more than 10% of your posts or comments may be self-promotional, or your post will be removed. F/LOSS Exception: If your post is about a project that is completely open source & can be self-hosted in full without payment, and your account is at least 7 days old, your post is exempt from this rule as long as you continue to engage in comments.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Curious to know what the experiences are for those who are sticking to bare metal. Would like to better understand what keeps such admins from migrating to containers, Docker, Podman, Virtual Machines, etc. What keeps you on bare metal in 2025?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] TeddE@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

They can but - if their current setup meets their needs - why? There ain't nothing wrong with having a few simple spare laptops, each an isolated environment for a few simple home server tasks each.

Don't get me wrong - I too advocate for docker, particularly on new builds, or as a relatively turnkey solution to get started for novice friends, but the best setup is the one that works, and they sound like they got theirs where they want it.

[โ€“] BrianTheFirst@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

..because that isn't what they said. They said that they are getting more serious and now looking at Docker, but the outdated version in the Mint repo is preventing them from exploring that any further. So I offered a method that I know works without any of the "dependency roulette" that they were concerned about, while also giving a disclaimer that it isn't exactly noob-friendly. ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ

[โ€“] TeddE@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

Fair point. I think my eyes glossed over the part where they said they where taking a second look at docker (but caught the rest about rebuilding the OS in general). My sincere apologies ๐Ÿ˜“๐Ÿ˜