this post was submitted on 07 Apr 2025
48 points (96.2% liked)

Selfhosted

60426 readers
206 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Detailed Rules Post

  1. Be civil.

  2. No spam.

  3. Posts are to be related to self-hosting.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or readme if you're providing a link.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title.

  6. No trolling.

  7. Promotion posts require active participation, with an account that is at least 30 days old. F/LOSS without a paywall has exceptions, with requirements. See the rules link for details.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
ruud@lemmy.world
Loki@lemmy.world
CannaVet@lemmy.world
devve@lemmy.world
ayyy@sh.itjust.works
curbstickle@anarchist.nexus
curbstickle_lw@lemmy.world
48
Basic networking/subnetting question. (lemmy.dbzer0.com)
submitted 1 year ago by marauding_gibberish142@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world
65 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Sorry for being such a noob. My networking is not very strong, thought I'd ask the fine folks here.

Let's say I have a Linux box working as a router and a dumb switch (I.e. L2 only). I have 2 PCs that I would like to keep separated and not let them talk to each other.

Can I plug these two PCs into the switch, configure their interfaces with IPs from different subnets, and configure the relevant sub-interfaces and ACLs (to prevent inter-subnet communication through the router) on the Linux router?

What I'm asking is; do I really need VLANs? I do need to segregate networks but I do not trust the operating systems running on these switches which can do L3 routing.

If you have a better solution than what I described which can scale with the number of computers, please let me know. Unfortunately, networking below L3 is still fuzzy in my head.

Thanks!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Subnets are on layer 3 not layer 2. You can easy access other devices on layer 3 by finding the right subnet on layer 2. ARP is used to resolve IP addresses into MAC addresses and vis versa.

[–] marauding_gibberish142@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Thanks, but isn't ARP contained inside a subnet? I guess you could find everything if you inspected the MAC table of the main switch

[–] nottelling@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

no. Arp bridges layer 1 and 2. It's switch local. With a VLAN, it becomes VLAN local, in the sense that 802.1q creates a "virtual" switch.

[–] marauding_gibberish142@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago

Sorry, I'm not sure what you mean by "ARP bridges L1 and L2". I'll have to read more about this. Other than that, I understand what you said.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 year ago

ARP is in a single broadcast domain which can span multiple switches.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

ARP is in the broadcast domain (otherwise known as a lan)

Vlans create multiple lans