this post was submitted on 14 Oct 2025
347 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

76562 readers
2927 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

According to Microsoft's documentation, a user can only change the setting to enable or disable the new People section three times a year.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FreedomAdvocate -4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Not sure why people are talking about the “you can only enable or disable it 3 times a year” as if it’s an issue? This is generally a thing you’d either turn off or on once, depending on what it defaults to. Why would anyone need to turn it on or off 3 times in a year?

[–] nulluser@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Why would anyone need to turn it on or off 3 times in a year?

Why would they need to limit you?

[–] FreedomAdvocate -4 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Irrelevant. Why would anyone need to turn it on or off 3 times in a year?

[–] nulluser@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Why do you need to know how other people use software to understand why arbitrary limits are arbitrary?

[–] FreedomAdvocate -2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I would assume that the "arbitrary limit" is actually based on something like the amount of processing power that it could take to go through every single photo/file that is uploaded.

Anyway, even if it is arbitrary - what reason would anyone have to turn it on and off more than 3x a year? It's something you'd decide you either want or you don't.

[–] nulluser@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

what reason would anyone have

That's none of your business. You don't need to know why anyone wants to do a thing to advocate for their freedom to do it.

Just because you lack the imagination to think of reasons someone might have, doesn't mean that they don't have a perfectly good reason. But, they shouldn't need to justify themselves to you.

[–] FreedomAdvocate -1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

The don’t have to justify themselves to me, they have to figure out how to handle only changing it 3 times a year.

I’m trying to understand any reasons why someone would turn it on/off more than once. Not asking people to “justify”, just curious because it’s not something that makes sense to turn on and off multiple times.

[–] nulluser@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

You don’t need to know why anyone wants to do a thing to advocate for their freedom to do it.

You don't know why they might want to do this thing. I also don't know why they would want to do this thing. The difference is, I 👏 Don't 👏 Care 👏. My opinion of their reason to want to do it is irrelevant to my advocating their freedom to do it.

And that's all I'm going to say on the subject. If you can't understand that basic fact, then I don't know what else I can say.

[–] FreedomAdvocate -1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I don’t care either though, I’m just asking why to try to understand the argument people like you are making.

The feature is a yes/no option, and it has no downsides for the user. It costs you nothing, it doesn’t affect performance, it doesn’t need extra privacy permissions or anything. I’m just trying to understand why anyone works firstly turn it off if it defaults to on, and then secondly why they would then turn it back on, then back off, and so on. Maybe there’s something I am missing about it that I don’t know? Maybe there’s something buried in the fine print?

Some when did trying to get more of an understanding become so offensive to some people?

It’s like if my health insurance said “we’ve just added elective surgeries to your plan at no cost. You can opt out/in up to 3 times a year” - I genuinely can’t see a reason why anyone would opt out once, let alone 3+ times a year, and so far no one has even attempted to give a reason why anyone would.

Unlike you, clearly, I like to learn things, especially about what makes people tick. I’m also a big believer in if you can’t explain your reasoning for your decision logically then you must have arrived at your decision illogically.

[–] xep@discuss.online 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

For someone called freedom advocate you sure don't sound like one.

[–] FreedomAdvocate -2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

What part of letting me name people in my uploaded photos so I can easily find all of the photos of them is somehow anti-freedom?