this post was submitted on 14 Oct 2025
249 points (92.8% liked)

Memes

52883 readers
917 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 16 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Stalin wasn't a perfect saint nor a horrendous monster. Stalin was a real socialist, with personal failings and mistakes, but also real victories and advancements as the leader of the first socialist state in its most turbulent era.

Demystifying Stalin

I know that after my death a pile of rubbish will be heaped on my grave, but the wind of History will sooner or later sweep it away without mercy.

  • J. V. Stalin
  1. Nia Frome's "Tankies"

[8 min]

  1. W. E. B Dubois' On Stalin

[6 min]

  1. Domenico Losurdo's Primitive Thinking and Stalin as Scapegoat

[30 min]

  1. Domenico Losurdo's Stalin and Stalinism in History

[16 min]

  1. J. V. Stalin interviewed by H. G. Wells

[42 min]

  1. J. V. Stalin interviewed by Emil Ludwig

[38 min]

  1. J. V. Stalin interviewed by Roy Howard

[9 min]

  1. Domenico Losurdo's Stalin: The History and Critique of a Black Legend

[5 hr 51 min]

  1. Ludo Martens' Another View of Stalin

[5 hr 25 min]

  1. Anna Louise Strong's This Soviet World

Stalin's Major Theoretical Contributions to Marxism

I have come to communism because of daddy Stalin and nobody must come and tell me that I mustn’t read Stalin. I read him when it was very bad to read him. That was another time. And because I’m not very bright, and a hard-headed person, I keep on reading him. Especially in this new period, now that it is worse to read him. Then, as well as now, I still find a Seri of things that are very good.

  • Che Guevara
  1. Economic Problems of Socialism in the USSR

  2. Dialectical and Historical Materialism

  3. History of the CPSU (B)

  4. The Foundations of Leninism

  5. Marxism and the National Question

[–] ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml 10 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Che, please don't call him that.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 9 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] Grapho@lemmy.ml 11 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I swear it don't sound as bad in Spanish lmao, "papi" can even be something you call a friend

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 9 points 6 days ago

Oh, gotcha! Makes sense, my spanish is super rusty and I didn't think about the different context it would have in spanish.

[–] scathliath@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Agreed, and to clarify, I'm pretty much a socialist, just think co-operatives oughta be allowed to hold similar assets to a state, (within the laws of a state in question) ideally subsidiary to the state's own collectivized system. The cold bit about Stalin was crediting the fellow with having more idealogical depth than the simple "funny gulag man" many paint him as.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 7 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Many socialist states do have cooperative sectors, the PRC has a pretty big cooperative sector, as did the USSR. At higher levels of development they become less useful, though, as production outscales simple cooperative formations. As for Stalin, again, he's not as bad as the Red Scare painted him as.

[–] scathliath@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

True, why I count myself among y'all, I just quibble over the details frankly. Bad habit of mine. The results themselves overall in terms of quality of life speak volumes over the reduction in quality of life under capitalist systems generally. Even with failures like Mao's famines.

Frankly the socialist states are generally more friendly to cooperatives over corporations. But again I call myself a social corporatist and folks usually imagine I'm arguing in favor of a techno-libertarian corporate congress. Pardon me for the lack of outright clarity.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 6 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Not to sound rude, but have you read much Marxist theory? There's good reason why we generally see cooperatives as only really useful in certain levels of development and certain industries for a certain period of time, and not as the basis of production.

[–] scathliath@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

True, and yes unfortunately on Marxist theory and commentary. Part of why I'm a disillusioned corporatist if I still count as one and not an outright socialist. What can I say, Marx makes good arguments for economies of scale.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 6 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Any reason you still hold to corporatism?

[–] scathliath@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Mostly, a misguided attachment to libertarianism, and a lack of faith in a successful global proletariat revolution. Thus why in the original comment I clarified "tankie"; the other bit? The American feds. Real Red-scare vibes over here.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 7 points 5 days ago (1 children)

There's no need for one big revolution, the revolution comes to different countries at different times. I think it sounds like you're already pretty self-aware, why not commit?

[–] scathliath@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

You know, that's a valid question I've been asking myself lately due to the intersection between American Union history and the current state of politics. Frankly, contribute to the local orgs already; so as I said, arguing I'm not under the umbrella isn't strictly valid.

The other bit being that you can loop folks further left out of the more extreme sections of the evangelical right by presenting yourself as a middle ground. Talk them into reading some libertarian theory, conservative theory, and to read Marx and Engels for comparative analysis. Or at worst, reduce the theory to memes and make them read it by cutting absurd bits. I'm a bit of a dadaism fan if it wasn't obvious.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 6 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I think it's pretty effective to be extremely clear and honest too, depends on the person.

[–] scathliath@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

True; frankly, it usually works. I may have just read too much philosophy and feel crappy feeling like I'm telling people what they oughta believe. Still, this was a delightful discussion. Have a lovely day in case I pass out (night shift).

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 4 points 5 days ago

Oh gosh, that sucks. Hope your shift ends well! I hated working nights.