this post was submitted on 14 Oct 2025
248 points (92.8% liked)
Memes
52883 readers
897 users here now
Rules:
- Be civil and nice.
- Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.
founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
To be clear, those weren't the folks I was referring to in my comment. But:
Absolutely welcome to ask, and I'll give it a shot nonetheless.
I would ask the anarchist (and the modern day ML too) if they agree with this part of Stalin's theory.
I don't, and would venture to say a modern day ML may also disagree with Stalin in this but even also have a penchant for his rehabilitation, for other reasons.
More tangentally I think anarchism and marxism are not fundamentally enemies, (so, in disagreement with Stalin here), and would suggest they primarily diverge on the role a state plays in mediating conflicts of private and public interests.
But if I were to try and find common ground with the bit from Stalin you're citing, just for argument's sake, it would be that this divergence is a fundamental relationship between the two, but I'd still maintain the differences are not incompatible or irreconcileable.
But again, for the record, I was being more snarky about people who pivot from talking about how Hitler could've won to how Stalin could've lost.