this post was submitted on 19 Oct 2025
140 points (98.6% liked)

Selfhosted

59999 readers
432 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam.

  3. Posts here are to be centered around self-hosting. Please ensure it is clear in your post how it relates to self-hosting.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or git here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title.

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It's proprietary, after all. I understand paid is fine, but even then, it usually better be open source.

So, why is Unraid an exception ?

Thanks

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] daq@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Mergerfs can do that too and you can keep the underlying fs as whatever you want.

[–] B0rax@feddit.org 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Yes, but it does not have redundancy or caching. Redundancy can be achieved with snapraid, but how you get caching I don’t know…

[–] daq@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Doesn't work for every use case, but perfect for mine. I was just pointing out other options.

[–] B0rax@feddit.org 1 points 8 months ago

And that is good! It would have been a better answer if you mentioned these major limitations as well so that interested people don’t need to look it up :)

[–] MangoPenguin@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

It has no parity, you can pair with snapraid but thats snapshot parity and not real-time parity. Depends on the use case if that would work or not.

Also no caching options.

[–] daq@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Valid points. I use it for my media collection I can easily restore and won't miss. Cache would be sort of nice to have and redundancy would just be wasting space.

[–] MangoPenguin@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 8 months ago

Yeah media is a good use case for it, and doesnt really need cache either.