this post was submitted on 19 Oct 2025
621 points (98.0% liked)

Technology

76248 readers
2950 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] echodot@feddit.uk 19 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Why? It wasn't there submersible, their product wasn't responsible for its destruction and frankly there is very little in the way of public sympathy.

The product is not even rated as waterproof and yet it's survived months at the bottom of the ocean after having survived a destructive implosion.

That's hella marketing.

[–] dev_null@lemmy.ml 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The marketing is more for the submersible camera that survived, just like it was designed to do, the SD card was just inside the camera and no water even touched it. I don't think the SD card should be getting any credit.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yeah I know but marketing is marketing. It doesn't really have to make any sense.

If the Xbox controller had survived I'm sure Microsoft would have made big of that even though it's basically irrelevant to the product.

[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

They didn't even use an Xbox controller, they cheaped out and used an ancient Logitech clone