this post was submitted on 23 Oct 2025
604 points (99.0% liked)

Selfhosted

52520 readers
759 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TommySoda@lemmy.world 33 points 2 days ago (2 children)

This is purely anecdotal, but I have been running into a lot of DNS issues over the past couple months where I work. 3 of the computers and even one of the laptops for remote work were having DNS issues that needed to be fixed. One even needed Windows reinstalled after fixing the DNS issue (Which was probably unrelated, but worth mentioning)

I'm honestly starting to think that the internet in general might be imploding. Not sure why, but replacing so many developers and programmers with AI might be responsible. Who knows, but it's definitely very strange.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 57 points 2 days ago (2 children)

The biggest issue is how centralized the internet has become. It went from a bunch of local servers to a handful of cloud providers.

We need to spread things out again

[–] metaStatic@kbin.earth 7 points 2 days ago

That's not how capitalism works though

[–] Canopyflyer@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

But but Bezos has to pay for another rocket and yacht and he just got married!!!! Think about his quarterly statement! My god are you heartless!!!!!!!!

/s

(just in case it's not obvious)

[–] ubergeek@lemmy.today 27 points 2 days ago (2 children)

A huge problem are developers who lack a fundamental understanding of how the internet even works. I've had to explain how short, unqualified names resolve vs how fqdns resolve. Or why even you may not be able to reach another node in your proverbial cluster, because they are on different subnets. Or, why using GUIDs as hostnames is a generally bad idea, and will cause things to fail in unpredictable ways, especially with deeply nested subdomains.

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I have worked with too many devs that didn't even know what the 7 layers/OSI are or why they exist.

they didn't know what a network port was used for and why it's important to not expose 3306 to the internet.

they couldn't understand that fragmentation of a message bus occurs when you don't dedupe the contents.

you know, morons.

[–] metaStatic@kbin.earth 14 points 2 days ago

Ah, the common clay of the new Web

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

GUIDs?
Could you expand on that topic? :)

[–] ubergeek@lemmy.today 2 points 2 days ago (2 children)
[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Why the fuck would anyone use a guid as a hostname?

My favorite I've seen in the category was when they had hostnames that were basically the IP address decorated with some bullshit. Like yeeeeeeeeah, that totally makes fucking sense. 😆

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I've seen those with public routing servers.
Example: IP-127.0.0.1.dtag.de

Makes sense there or for webservers.
But anywhere else? Lol not really

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago

Why would someone want that as their hostname???
I'd understand mountpoint but that?