this post was submitted on 23 Oct 2025
154 points (94.3% liked)

Technology

81653 readers
5673 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Bloefz@lemmy.world -5 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (5 children)

Does it really matter? I think the extreme amount of languages in the world right now is not helping us communicate. I don't view language as a cultural heritage thing, just a communication protocol. And I have moved around a lot in the world, it's very difficult to be constantly adapting to different languages. That causes a societal integration barrier for me.

I think if we had a universal language (note that it wouldn't have to be English) we would be able to understand each other better and have less wars.

PS: I'm not advocating to ban languages or something, just to have a universal one. A bit like what Esperanto tried to achieve. Mutual language means more mutual understanding and thus less "us vs them" underbelly feelings that the fascists thrive on.

[โ€“] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Languages have their own quirks and characters, representative of the people's cultural values and history, and express ideas not even present in other cultures. As many languages have to be preserved as possible for these reasons.

[โ€“] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Esperanto still exists and there is a worldwide community of speakers.

[โ€“] Bloefz@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Oh yes I know but as a common universal language it really has failed. It never became more than a fringe thing (sorry).

[โ€“] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 months ago

It is the most popular one. If somebody wanted to start a competitor, they'd have a hard time.

[โ€“] SuperNovaStar@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

I don't view language as a cultural heritage thing, just a communication protocol.

Language is absolutely political, a product of its specific environment, and there is a lot that can be communicated in one language that would be difficult in another. Erasing languages isn't like no longer manufacturing a specific style of plug, instead it silences viewpoints and enforces the cultural hegemony of the dominant group.

There's a reason fascists are fond of erasing the languages of the marginalized.

[โ€“] Bloefz@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Like I said I don't advocate erasing languages. Just to have a common international language whichever it is. Local languages can still play a big role in cultural matters (eg literature and life on the street for locals)

I'm from Holland myself and I know most people there don't care so much about our quirky language, we are happy to speak other ones. It doesn't mean that Dutch is worth any less. Mind that it doesn't have to be English (especially now that the US is rapidly declining as a world power). But whatever it is, I wish the world would just pick one so I don't have to keep learning new languages every time I move.

But failing a global language perhaps AI translators will become so good and smooth to use that soon we can just communicate regardless of what languages we speak.