this post was submitted on 25 Oct 2025
60 points (98.4% liked)

Selfhosted

52586 readers
485 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I'm going round in circles on this one.

What I want to do is:

  • serve up my self-hosted apps with https (to local clients only - nothing over the open web)
  • address them as 'app.server.lan' or 'sever.lan/app'
  • preferably host whatever is needed in docker

I think this is achievable with a reverse proxy, some kind of DNS server and self-signed certs. I'm not a complete noob but my knowledge in this area is lacking. I've done a fair bit of research but I'm probably not using the right terminology or whatever.

Would anyone have a link to a good guide that covers this?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] robador51@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I do the same. I have a real domain and certbot does a dns challenge. It was a little fiddly and took a moment to figure out, i think that was because i couldn't gat caddy to work, but traefik worked a charm. Self signing is more complex i think because you'll need to accept the root in every client (browsers especially?), which is even more fiddly.

[–] elvith@feddit.org 1 points 2 days ago

Yeah, that's exactly why I didn't use my own CA. There's a plethora of devices that you now need to import the CA to and then you need to hope, that every application uses the system cert store and doesn't roll its own (IIRC e.g. Firefox uses its own cert store and doesn't use the system cert store. Same for every java based application,...)

It's fiddly with Caddy, as you need a specific plugin to get it to work with anything else than the default challenge. That means using a custom build via caddy - and with docker, you're SOL. BUT you can just use certbot and point caddy to the cert file in your file system.