this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2025
196 points (99.5% liked)

Leopards Ate My Face

8379 readers
497 users here now

Rules:

  1. The mods are fallible; if you've been banned or had a post/comment removed, please appeal.
  2. Off-topic posts will be removed. If you don't know what "Leopards ate my Face" is, try reading this post.
  3. If the reason your post meets Rule 1 isn't in the source, you must add a source in the post body (not the comments) to explain this.
  4. Posts should use high-quality sources, and posts about an article should have the same headline as that article. You may edit your post if the source changes the headline. For a rough idea, check out this list.
  5. For accessibility reasons, an image of text must either have alt text or a transcription in the post body.
  6. Reposts within 1 year or the Top 100 of all time are subject to removal.
  7. This is not exclusively a US politics community. You're encouraged to post stories about anyone from any place in the world at any point in history as long as you meet the other rules.
  8. All Lemmy.World Terms of Service apply.

Also feel free to check out:

Icon credit C. Brück on Wikimedia Commons.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/37869106

Notable majority feel the country is headed in the wrong direction, and only 27% approve of his job performance

Donald Trump’s standing with Hispanic adults has dropped notably since he took office at the start of the year, according to a new poll.

Polling by the Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research suggests growing unease among a voting bloc that was crucial to his 2024 re-election victory. The October survey shows that 25% of Hispanic adults now hold a “somewhat” or “very” favorable view of Trump, down sharply from 44% in an AP-NORC poll conducted just before he began his second term.

At the same time, the share of Hispanic respondents who believe the nation is headed in the wrong direction has risen from 63% in March to 73% in October.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dmention7@midwest.social 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I think that's a different question than the point I was trying to make. By all means, educating people as a way to "de-program" and shield them from propaganda is probably the most effective defense, followed by going after the propagandists themselves.

But however you go about trying to fix those systemic issues, it's important to remember that falling for propaganda isn't solely an individual failing. Intelligent and powerful people have been attacking education and unbiased news sources (among other things) for decades, precisely with the goal of making people more susceptible to their propaganda. Maybe they should know better, but a working class person, whose main focus is feeding and housing their family, is at a severe disadvantage in an information war.

[–] kelpie_returns@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

All of this is very true. It's also worth noting that intelligent people are sometimes more susceptible to propaganda because they often have the ability to rationalize their decisions more cleanly and effectively than others, while remaining just as vulnerable to the hazard as anyone else.

Holding perpetrators of this system accountable is obviously a must if we want to truly better this situation, but deeming them beyond repair is walking a razorblade of a line that ultimately plays into the very same mentality that got us here to begin with. Imo, odds are real high that this kind of tribe mentality will be the choke point that ensures we never reach any desirable next step in our social evolution.

It is easy to see things through an absolutist lens, but rarely actually helpful. The real, living world takes place between the black and the white. Every single inch and ounce of it. Until we, as a species, figure that out and start acting accordingly, we will more likely than not continue on our death spiral.