this post was submitted on 28 Oct 2025
72 points (98.6% liked)
Technology
81374 readers
4818 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Question:
Does buying arms from the USA essentially necessitate using Palantir or related products?
edit: I got the gist of the article wrong. Anduril does produce arms, and the deal is about producing them, not buying. My question stands though.
I'm not sure, but that's a good question.
I believe Ukraine used Palantir against Russia, but when the U.S. becomes involved in a proxy war (even if it's to defend a nation that was clearly invaded by a leader who posed a global threat) it's hard to know what is actually chosen by the country vs provided as is.
No. For sure not. The interoperability of different tools and kit, from an outsiders perspective, kind of all over the place. Different companies have some internal interop, but generally its a mix between standards set by who ever is buying (branch, or org like NATO) and compatible with industry leader in relevant use case.
At least if you look at Defense companies GitHub, Earnings Reports, and Job postings and the militaries public statements.