Technology
Which posts fit here?
Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.
Post guidelines
[Opinion] prefix
Opinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title.
Rules
1. English only
Title and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original link
Post URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communication
All communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. Inclusivity
Everyone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacks
Any kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangents
Stay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may apply
If something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.
Companion communities
!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip
Icon attribution | Banner attribution
If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.
view the rest of the comments
I lost count of the ways this article misrepresented and misinterpreted the underlying research.
No, it does not "replace the metal in future computers" the thing it's promising to replace is specific kinds of non-volatile memory which is typically made from specially doped and patterned silicon with metal interconnects. Replace the silicon part does nothing about the metal part and it still requires the metal interconnects to do anything interesting.
No, memristors alone are not a good stand alone memory storage devices.
No, a <6KHz with <90% accuracy is not a "grow at home replacement" for modern computing memory systems operating at >2,000,000KHz signal speeds with >99.999999999999% accuracy rates (measured as ~10^-12 bit error rate).
Cool research, potentially interesting applications to neuromorphic computing but FUCK this blatant misinformation slop.