this post was submitted on 30 Oct 2025
474 points (97.8% liked)

Progressive Politics

3552 readers
299 users here now

Welcome to Progressive Politics! A place for news updates and political discussion from a left perspective. Conservatives and centrists are welcome just try and keep it civil :)

(Sidebar still a work in progress post recommendations if you have them such as reading lists)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Fredthefishlord@lemmy.blahaj.zone 22 points 1 month ago (11 children)

If you care more seriously, you'd take over the farms and distribute it. Taking over grocery stores without the greater infrastructure is just causing food shortages when the distribution points can't function, and the producers don't have funding

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 14 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Oh yeah, they tried this in China in the 50s. It went great.

[–] somethingsnappy@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It would be stupid and terrible either way, but that was a government takeover.

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub -2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

but that was a government takeover.

How else do you imagine a large-scale infrastructure would happen? an angry mob?

[–] somethingsnappy@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)
[–] DagwoodIII@piefed.social 3 points 1 month ago

It was something they could do a few times. It makes a nice story, but doesn't mean there was any significant change.

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 1 points 1 month ago

The post is not a description of large-scale infrastructure takeover. That was literally the point of this comment thread.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)