this post was submitted on 31 Oct 2025
405 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

76562 readers
2811 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Google announced the end of support for early Nest Thermostats in a support document earlier this year that largely flew under the radar. As of October 25, first and second generation units released in 2011 and 2012, respectively, will be unpaired and removed from the Google Nest or Google Home app.

Users will no longer be able to control their thermostats remotely via their smartphone, receive notifications, or change settings from a mobile device. End-of-support also disables third-party assistants and other cloud-based features including multi-device Eco mode and Nest Protect connectivity.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 56 points 3 days ago (4 children)

This isn’t “end of support.”

This is “loss of functionality.”

Totally inexcusable.

[–] spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works 17 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Samsung did something similar with one of their tablets when they remotely removed an app that provided an IR remote function - a primary reason for my purchase. Samsung's support not so politely told me, "Too fucking bad." when I objected.

There was something I could do about it though. Even though a replacement 3rd party app was less than $5 I haven't purchased another Samsung consumer product or service in almost a decade.

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

They were rude to you about it too? Jesus. I’m pleased to say I’ve never bought any Samsung product.

[–] chillpanzee@lemmy.ml 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yeah. And even "loss of functionality" makes it sound passive; as if it just happened by accident. They Intentionally broke a working product.

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago

Heh I guess this is my work self showing through. I’m a software developer and “loss of function” is a very severe term to me :D it’s only surpassed by loss of data, accessibility/legal issue, and security/privacy breach. On the less severe end we have loss of telemetry, degraded function (meaning there’s still a workaround) degraded performance, and finally cosmetic defect.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

No it isn't. I have one of these, the only loss of function is remote internet settings, which was a stupid feature. It was an escalator, it's now become stairs. It still works fine as a thermostat, except Communist countries no longer know my house temperature.

Amazing how tech heads focus on minor shit like this with the long list of problems currently facing Fascist America.

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 1 points 17 hours ago

I don’t say loss of ALL function.

You have lost functionality, sir. But people who overpaid for early Nest products have always been amazing at justifying their own purchases, so I’m not surprised you’re now minimizing this move.

[–] mack@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 3 days ago

As most of our tech.

Being someone that yield to my tech stuff as long as possible I really love to live in a world where a company is forced to opensource everything related to a specific product if they opt to stop maintaining it.