this post was submitted on 31 Oct 2025
        
      
      405 points (99.0% liked)
      Technology
    76562 readers
  
      
      2811 users here now
      This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
 - Only tech related news or articles.
 - Be excellent to each other!
 - Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
 - Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
 - Politics threads may be removed.
 - No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
 - Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
 - Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
 - Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
 
Approved Bots
        founded 2 years ago
      
      MODERATORS
      
    you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
    view the rest of the comments
The website you linked to says that it’s not a class action suit, but a “mass arbitration” which I’ve never heard of. It also claims that Google has a “no class action” clause in its warranty/user agreement. I don’t see how that’s legal, but whatever. I also wonder if that clause was there at the time of purchase for gen 1 and gen 2 thermostats.
Thanks, I missed that detail. It's probably because of the "no class action" clause that this is a "mass arbitration".
Unfortunately that usually means that Google is paying a specific company to decide on the outcome of the case. in this case it looks like American Arbitration Association has a contract with Google.
They're supposed to be fair for both sides, but it's been shown that they almost always rule in favor of the company that has pre-selected them.
If anyone is in this situation, they will likely have a much better chance by convincing a judge to allow a different 3rd party to arbitrate the case.