this post was submitted on 31 Oct 2025
        
      
      405 points (99.0% liked)
      Technology
    76562 readers
  
      
      2811 users here now
      This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
 - Only tech related news or articles.
 - Be excellent to each other!
 - Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
 - Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
 - Politics threads may be removed.
 - No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
 - Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
 - Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
 - Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
 
Approved Bots
        founded 2 years ago
      
      MODERATORS
      
    you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
    view the rest of the comments
It's mostly network segregation and decluttering. Those things shouldn't be on a data network where you then have to filter them all off from the rest. A dedicated network that's designed for this kind of thing makes much more sense. Also Watts add up. One of them maybe just 5 (which seems a bit high), but when you've got sensors, lights, switches, etc., it can end up being significant.
If you're talking about a commercial building or something, sure. I get the concept I suppose it just seems like it's probably optimizing 2025 hardware against 2005 constraints when we're talking about a single household. I'm unlikely to automate any part of my home in the near future but if I ever did I'd definitely want to look for some data (like, "gaming latency increases 20% with 10 smart devices").
If you just have that one gadget, I agree it makes little to no difference.