this post was submitted on 01 Nov 2025
360 points (89.6% liked)

Technology

76585 readers
3001 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
L4s@hackingne.ws
360
China solves 'century-old problem' with new analog chip that is 1,000 times faster than high-end Nvidia GPUs (www.livescience.com)
submitted 3 days ago by kalkulat@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
115 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

"The new device is built from arrays of resistive random-access memory (RRAM) cells.... The team was able to combine the speed of analog computation with the accuracy normally associated with digital processing. Crucially, the chip was manufactured using a commercial production process, meaning it could potentially be mass-produced."

Article is based on this paper: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41928-025-01477-0

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Melobol@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The summary was for the paper the article was based on. And it was also put it in an easier to understand language.

[โ€“] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 1 points 2 days ago

That's potentially useful then at least!

The big challenge with AI generated summaries is that LLMs are so prone to innaccuracy that a summary that's never checked for accuracy by a human who has read the source material that's being summarized, it just exists in a weird limbo state of maybe-false maybe-perfectly-fine and the onus is still on the reader to read the source material to make their own decision just as it is without posting an AI summary

LLMs are brilliant first draft machines. Unless there's a major breakthrough that improves accuracy they will need to stay that way