this post was submitted on 02 Nov 2025
622 points (98.1% liked)

Technology

76665 readers
2619 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 25 points 5 days ago (3 children)

Time to start wearing face paint / face tattoos that fuck with facial recognition.

[–] falcunculus@jlai.lu 21 points 5 days ago (2 children)

In their world, resisting surveillance will be probable cause for arrest, because you must have something to hide and need to be investigated.

[–] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 8 points 4 days ago

It doesn’t matter. At this point resistance is a responsibility. They will lie and make shit up either way so challenge them while you still can.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 7 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (4 children)

But it's my religious markings from my officially recognized religion/church.

[–] Xhead@lemmings.world 14 points 4 days ago

Like that makes a difference when they pick you up in a unmarked Ford transit and drop you off at the ~~concentration camp~~ ice detention facility

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago

is it Christian? no? straight to jail, terrorist.

[–] Atropos@lemmy.world 8 points 5 days ago

Yeah but it's not THEIR religion, so you still are suspicious...

[–] K1nsey6@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I don't think anything like that would help. Especially over the last several years with the huge rise of things like Snapchat filters where people can take photos of themselves in various situations with various costumes, various themes. I'm sure all of that was data mined for someone's purpose.

[–] UltraMagnus@startrek.website 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer_vision_dazzle it's been done before. AI facial recognition gets a little overhyped

[–] boomzilla@programming.dev 0 points 4 days ago

A recent famous case that comes to mind is when some independent researchers found an ex-RAF terrorist on the run (or call her whatever your political inclination suits) via facial recognition of photos on social media of a capobeira club. I assume the reference material were some age old photos as she was on the run for decades.

I don't know much about facial recognition but I only heard it works damn well and considering OS and phone manufacturers employing it and are confident enough to not have their users locked out or compromise security let's me assume that it works damn well.

[–] Cybersteel@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Is that why cyberpunk media always has people wearing face tats.

Sometimes it's explicitly called out for that reason ya. Can't say all the time though.