this post was submitted on 03 Nov 2025
453 points (94.5% liked)

Technology

76585 readers
2933 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 19 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Cwtch. XMPP. Matrix. SimpleX. Quiet. Delta Chat. Arcane Chat. Revolt. Briar. Meshtastic. etc. etc. etc.

[–] a4ng3l@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Aren’t most of those requiring dedicated setup? How does that work without a pre-existing communication channel such as email to prep for them? You walk to every party you need to integrate?

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Sorry, I don't understand the words you're using. Some of them are peer to peer. Some of them use servers which can be hosted by individuals. Some of them work locally over Bluetooth or WiFi.

[–] a4ng3l@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Damn. They didn’t seem so wild especially compared to the flow of yours. All mediums / techs you listed are complex technologies that take efforts to setup. Compared to the ubiquitousness of email. How do you propose to make that as available to the baseline human being?

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Email is much more difficult to configure than most of these services. Some of them require no configuration at all. You just open the app, type in the recipient's address, and Bob's your uncle.

For others, it's already available through community projects like AdminForge and Disroot.

[–] a4ng3l@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Users don’t need to configure email that’s kind of the point… and the receiving side of most of your techs still had to eventually setup the server side right? Adminforge is Linux tutorials, hardly something for the basic user. And disroot has not the best reputation if I can trust the few top links in my search results due to its gtc where they mentioned that they would collaborate in criminal investigations as well.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

Users don’t need to configure email that’s kind of the point…

Users don't "need" to configure these services either. That's the entire point.

You can either configure it yourself, or use someone else's that has configured it for you. Or you can choose one of the p2p apps that simply don't require any configuration. These are your choices.

Adminforge is Linux tutorials

AdminForge runs a variety of services for public use.

And disroot has not the best reputation if I can trust the few top links in my search results due to its gtc where they mentioned that they would collaborate in criminal investigations as well.

Much like Proton (and every other company/org), they have to either choose to comply or close up shop.

[–] a4ng3l@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

But then you need to trust another party which is just moving the problem along…

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

These are your choices. There's no other way.

[–] HereIAm@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

But that was the entire point from the first reply. If you don't trust external hosts, there is nothing for you.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

You already forgot the other choices...

Self hosting and p2p

[–] _cryptagion@anarchist.nexus -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The "baseline human being" can easily set up most of those.

[–] a4ng3l@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You should consider reviewing your baseline to integrate actual persons. Some need help to use WhatsApp so go figure how they would fare with most of those.

[–] _cryptagion@anarchist.nexus 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Are people that have trouble using Whatsapp typically overlapping with people looking for E2EE anonymous communications?

You can't criticize software for being too hard for "baseline human beings" when your baseline is apparently boomers who lived most of their lives before the internet was widely available.

[–] a4ng3l@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Ah no I was assuming we need privacy for everyone… but this would work as well. When working in responsible disclosure this is very much a problem. You want those channels open as wide as possible and as easy as possible.

And to a large extent I suspect boomers were a bit more into systems and protocols than the new gens.

But keep on…

[–] mjr@infosec.pub -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Most of those still rely on some company to host a server, except Briar, and in practice most Briar users are still relying on companies to access Tor to connect.

They are more robust, not perfect.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

None of them require a company to host a server. That was my entire point.

[–] mjr@infosec.pub -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Explain how you'd use Delta Chat without a server, please? I may have misunderstood its need for a mailserver when I tried it.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I didn't say without a server, I said without a company-hosted server.

[–] mjr@infosec.pub 0 points 1 day ago (2 children)

How do you even get a non-company-hosted server now? Public bodies don't host services for outsiders much any more and aren't really safe places for privacy in this type of case anyway.

[–] _cryptagion@anarchist.nexus 5 points 1 day ago

How do you even get a non-company-hosted server now?

they typed out on their computer capable of hosting anything they want

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You run your own or just choose from a variety of publicly-available ones.

[–] mjr@infosec.pub 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Run your own? Great, but you'll almost certainly be getting a company to connect it up.

Publicly available from whom? Companies!

I may sometimes wish community-owned internet became the norm, but it didn't, so companies are involved almost everywhere.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I run several of these services with no company involved.

Publicly available from, as I said, individuals.

[–] mjr@infosec.pub 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm sceptical. Name me a server and I'll show you a company involved.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] mjr@infosec.pub 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

infosec.pub appears to be in Hetzner Online GmbH's Falkenstein hosting. They probably also own the hardware.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 1 points 1 day ago

I dunno man, the problem with most private servers is that they're just that. I don't know where they are or who is hosting them. I only know where mine is.