this post was submitted on 04 Nov 2025
632 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

81118 readers
4448 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] tal@lemmy.today 55 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (4 children)

From what I have read, he's still likely to be able to line up enough votes to get his $1 trillion pay package (and the associated voting rights), despite a lot of major institutional investors being in opposition. But we'll see when the vote goes though.

I think that Tesla can probably get a more-effective CEO for less money, personally. Even if he leaves as CEO, he still owns 15% of Tesla and is fabulously wealthy as a result. I don't feel like he's getting a bad deal.

I do think that there are some arguments that the SEC should pass some regulation to help ensure board-CEO independence; part of the issue is that the board, which is supposed to oversee Musk, has been considered to be acting on his behalf by quite a few people. I don't think that it will happen under the present administration, though.

[–] Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip 30 points 3 months ago (1 children)

He wants the bragging rights. It's just a game at these numbers

[–] neukenindekeuken@sh.itjust.works 7 points 3 months ago

1 Trillion % this.

[–] Lemmyoutofhere@lemmy.ca 21 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Slime mould would be a better CEO.

[–] angrystego@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

Slime mould is pretty cool in general!

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Effective yes, but uh what's the wording image-that-props-up-crazy-valuation no.

[–] FreedomAdvocate -3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I think that Tesla can probably get a more-effective CEO for less money, personally.

Musk takes $0 pay as CEO other than these post-performance-goal-hit pay packets though. Good luck finding another CEO who will work for free for 5+ years.

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I'll happily do it for $1 million a year and do a hell of a lot better than musk. Considering the difference between $1 trillion and $1 million is pretty much $1 trillion I'm basically working for free.

[–] FreedomAdvocate -1 points 3 months ago

He’s not getting paid a trillion a year - he’s getting paid $0. They pay you $1mil a year and go nowhere good. They pay him nothing and if they hit goals people say are impossible he gets a trillion.