this post was submitted on 06 Nov 2025
841 points (97.9% liked)

Technology

76665 readers
2552 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] RiverRabbits@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 1 day ago (2 children)

"convenience"? You mean CEOs being able to lay off workers with some magical technology that does nothing? Yeah, that's surely convenient for the 0.1% of people in the world that doesn't affect. Love that "convenience" for them.

Did it cup your balls during the last BJ or something? Fucking hell, what is it with randos on the web scaping for AI at every instance...

[–] Eyedust@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 day ago

Friend saw 'convenience' and that was it. No more reading, only fists. I thought I was quite neutral. Yes, convenience. I have been known to use a local LLM based on recipes to give me ideas what I could make based on my pantry.

I have a lovely recipe for absolutely delicious chocolate-chip cookies that use pancake mix.

[–] SorryQuick@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Are you trying to deny that AI is also convenient for regular people?

[–] RiverRabbits@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

Uh, yes. AI cannot and does not have productive output as its goal, technologically speaking. Therefore, any "convenience" is imagined and projected upon an algorithm of statistically most likely text. It's just a statistician strapped in front of the 1 Million Monkeys thought experiment.

It's quintessentially useless, unless your ultimate goal is text resembling language en masse. But usually, Loren Ipsum is much more energy efficient.

[–] SorryQuick@lemmy.ca 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

But if it saves time on some simple tasks, how can you say it’s not convenient?

[–] RiverRabbits@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

there is no task that is meaningful time saved by a kind of context-dependant lorem ipsum. The task is then not done, but simply rejected on its face.

[–] SorryQuick@lemmy.ca 1 points 33 minutes ago

I have no clue what you’re trying to say.

If I ask an AI to write an email and it does so both better and faster than I could, how can you say it’s inconvenient and doesn’t save time?