this post was submitted on 21 Nov 2025
638 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

76992 readers
3094 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MantisToboggon@lemmy.world 28 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If they are training on my emails, they are going to be dumb as fuck.

[–] TheFogan@programming.dev 20 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Honestly I don't get how AI isn't rolling backwards already. Image sites are burried in AI slop. Social media posts are burried in AI slop, and now e-mails, that were probably written by AIs. How is AI even remotely improving right now, when obviously 90% of any new training data it's getting, was generated by the last generation of AI.

[–] Cricket@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 day ago

From what I've been hearing, AI has indeed been getting worse, not better. I think I read this in relation to ChatGPT 5 compared to previous models.

[–] dan@upvote.au 14 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Companies that build large LLMs have already said that this is becoming a problem. They're running out of high-quality human-written content to train their models.

Google paid Reddit to get access to their data to train their models, which is probably why their AI can be a bit dumb at times (and of course, the users that actually contributed the content don't get any of that money)

[–] TheFogan@programming.dev 3 points 1 day ago

that's true, but I think it's in the phrasing, they describe it as a shortage of human made content. the bigger issue to note is the lack of ability to identify human made content. IE you give it reddit and our e-mails, there's plenty of human made content on there... but nobody knows what percentage of it is actually bots or AIs.

[–] WhatGodIsMadeOf@feddit.org 7 points 1 day ago