this post was submitted on 26 Nov 2025
363 points (98.1% liked)

Selfhosted

53767 readers
384 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

  7. No low-effort posts. This is subjective and will largely be determined by the community member reports.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
ruud@lemmy.world
Loki@lemmy.world
CannaVet@lemmy.world
devve@lemmy.world
HybridSarcasm@lemmy.world
HybridSarcasm@lemmy.hybridsarcasm.xyz
363
Immich Is Now Stable! (peertube.futo.org)
submitted 3 weeks ago by mesamunefire@piefed.social to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world
78 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

You can find Immich at https://immich.app/ If you want to buy Immich merch, go to https://immich.store/ You can learn more about FUTO at https://futo.org/

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 0 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Still container-dependent?

[–] renegadespork@lemmy.jelliefrontier.net 30 points 3 weeks ago

If you go into self-hosting hating containers, you’re gonna have a bad time.

[–] AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today 19 points 3 weeks ago

Containers are the best, so probably

[–] Cyber@feddit.uk 1 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I'm running it bare metal on my NAS.

No problems, plus I don't have to do extra container stuff.

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Dude containers are often easier than running the underlying programs.

[–] Cyber@feddit.uk 5 points 3 weeks ago

Not arguing with you, it's just a choice.

The question was whether Immich had to be executed from within a container system... and it doesn't have to.

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works -3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

"not running in a container" is not "running on bare metal". It's just running outside a container.

[–] Cyber@feddit.uk 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I guess that's true.

I'm running it outside of a container and outside a VM... as there's no abstraction layer on top of the underlying OS. Which I guess is inside the bare metal.

So, Yep.

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 weeks ago

"Bare metal" has traditionally meant without any os either. Your code executes directly on hardware and has direct control over everything. Like a micro controller.

Code in a container executes on the hardware in exactly my the same way as code not running in a container - with the os as an intermediary.