this post was submitted on 02 Dec 2025
13 points (67.6% liked)

Not The Onion

18936 readers
1399 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] falseWhite@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I don't use YouTube, so for those interested:

Ha basically had a ton of music "in which lyrics breached terrorism legislation and intended to incite racial hatred."

And he was distributing these across the UK and EU.

I see nothing wrong about him being charged. Although I would kinda like to hear those lyrics and just how bad theu are. But inciting terrorism, racial hatred and violence should certainly be punishable by law.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cg4n5k2lq7no.amp

[–] douglasg14b@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Define "inciting"

This is where things get tricky. Leave that ambiguous and technically anything can be "inciting" if it's in words.

Whether that's racism, or anti-authoritarianism, or just speaking I'll about your government.

Freedom of speech, as a concept, doesn't work if it applies only to some speech. Controls around it will be abused and used against you at some point (Look at where the U.S. is heading).

This makes me nervous about more authoritarianism, as it sets a dangerous precedent that can be abused.