this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2026
300 points (99.7% liked)

Programmer Humor

32263 readers
1989 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SeductiveTortoise@piefed.social 14 points 1 hour ago

I added guardrails to myself to make sure I do not accidentally delete anything on production. I would never ever let an intern, a junior dev or a fucking AI onto that database. Not in a thousand cold nights.

[–] urushitan@kakera.kintsugi.moe 1 points 7 minutes ago

oh wait, is this this THE sol 5.6? The most amazing model ever with trust me bro benchmarks? The model that is observed cheating more than any previous model? surprised_pikachu.jpg

In all seriousness it never should have production creds anyway. But the fact this is soul sucking openai's newest flagship model with thinking cranked up is the cherry on top. The company that is literally cheating and shortcutting its way ahead produces models in its own image, the sci fi story writes itself.

[–] disorderly@lemmy.world 36 points 2 hours ago

My company has been trying a new model when product folks cut through the red tape of "engineering" and just describe what they want to a powerful LLM pipeline and review the app in a beta env. Sounds perfect, right?

Dear reader, in the couple months this has been going on, these people have caused a dozen high profile SEVs due to extremely poor app performance, networking / kubernetes configuration bugs, bad scaling, observability oversights, supply chain attacks, leaking sensitive information, and cost overruns (on practically every resource they provision).

Some very well-paid people are scrambling to figure out the value that was generated by this pilot program; I'm heating up popcorn rather than holding my breath.

[–] Protoknuckles@lemmy.world 81 points 3 hours ago (3 children)

Should have added "no mistakes, no bugs" to the prompt! Pffft, amateur.

[–] Flower@sh.itjust.works 47 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

That takes me back to 2004

No Smoke, by unknown,

Tech: "Hello. How can I help you today?"

Customer: "There's smoke coming from the power supply on my computer."

Tech: "Sounds like you need a new power supply."

Customer: "No, I don't! I just need to change the startup files."

Tech: "Sir, what you describe is a faulty power supply. You need to replace it."

Customer: "No way! Someone told me that I just had to change the system startup files to fix the problem! All I need is for you to tell me the right command."

(Ten minutes later...)

Tech: "Well, we don’t normally tell our customers this, but there's an undocumented command that will fix the problem. Add the line "LOAD NOSMOKE.COM" at the end of the CONFIG.SYS file and everything should work fine."

(Five minutes later...)

Customer: "It didn’t work. The power supply is still smoking."

Tech: "Well, what version of Windows are you using?"

Customer: "Windows 98."

Tech: "Well, that's your problem. That version of Windows doesn't include NOSMOKE. You'll need to contact Microsoft and ask them for a patch."

(When nearly an hour had passed, the phone rang again...)

Customer: "I need a new power supply."

Tech: "How did you come to that conclusion?"

Customer: "Well, I called Microsoft and told the technician what you said, and he started asking me questions about the make of the power supply."

Tech: "What did he tell you?"

Customer: "He said my power supply is not compatible with NOSMOKE."

[–] BLAMM@lemmy.world 4 points 39 minutes ago

That is way older that 2004. I first read that in the early 90s.

[–] voidsignal@lemmy.world 24 points 3 hours ago

Lol. "do magic"

[–] muhyb@programming.dev 1 points 1 hour ago

"or you go to jail"

[–] Gullible@sh.itjust.works 36 points 3 hours ago

I could have done the same for a quarter the cost!

[–] renzhexiangjiao@piefed.blahaj.zone 32 points 3 hours ago (4 children)

letting your agent run commands without reviewing them first is peak stupid

[–] john_lemmy@slrpnk.net 7 points 1 hour ago

Claude code even added an auto mode so that you don't get blocked by that pesky reviewing anymore. Since then, the usual mode of asking before running a command, for instance when the thing wants to read the entire codebase looking for information only available in an online doc, is now called manual mode; the non 10x developer mode.

[–] Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 2 hours ago

Having production credentials in a dev environment is more stupider but they'll never learn because they outsourced their thinking.

[–] uuj8za@piefed.social 31 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Creating an environment that incentivizes not thinking is peak stupid.

[–] dbx12@programming.dev 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

I for one welcome that change. Let them sloppify their brains once the rug is pulled and token cost skyrockets (or AI isn't able to fix its own fuckups) the human developer will rise again.

[–] Venator@lemmy.nz 3 points 25 minutes ago* (last edited 25 minutes ago) (1 children)

*after the ensuing recession/greater depression...

[–] urushitan@kakera.kintsugi.moe 1 points 6 minutes ago

"I'll be swimming in jobs if I don't starve first!"

[–] placebo@lemmy.zip 8 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

As well as storing production credentials in plain text in an .env file.

[–] thr0w4w4y2@sh.itjust.works 6 points 4 hours ago

should have used Weaviate.