this post was submitted on 15 Jul 2026
288 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

86401 readers
2864 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] eicker@lemmy.world 11 points 22 hours ago

If AI companies can copy entire libraries first and ask permission later, copyright becomes optional for the biggest players. The outcome of these lawsuits won’t just decide who pays authors. It could determine whether creators still have meaningful control over their work in the AI era.

[–] boatswain@infosec.pub 24 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Good on them, but I'm sure that will have as much impact as the suit against book scanning did a decade ago.

[–] mecen@lemmy.ca 4 points 23 hours ago

They should still sue

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

I'm sure that case will be cited here.

In similar cases, the court has found the company liable for using the books without paying for them (so they had to pay for every individual book) but the process of training an AI model was 'sufficiently transformative' (see: Authors Guild v Google) so as to not be considered a copyright violation.

They may win damages equal to the costs of the books that were used, but they won't get the models deleted or be able to claim damages for the models that were created.

[–] Tim_Bisley@piefed.social 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I dunno there was quite an impact when they sued the internet archive.

[–] boatswain@infosec.pub 4 points 1 day ago

I think the legal team at Google is probably several orders of magnitude better funded though, which seems to be how things go :/