this post was submitted on 14 Jun 2025
468 points (98.8% liked)

World News

47494 readers
2227 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] kayky@thelemmy.club 9 points 13 hours ago

Gaining more respect for the Irish by the day.

[–] Bravo@eviltoast.org 83 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

Note: by having the USA abstain from that UN vote right at the end of his presidency, Obama made it possible (ie legal) for us to do this.

If we were targeting Israel specifically, we would run afoul of all sorts of EU regulations since external trade policy falls under EU competency. HOWEVER, because there is a UN resolution specifically identifying the Israeli-occupied Palestinian territories as illegal occuptions under international law, it's possible for us to pass a law that doesn't specifically target Israel by name, but rather target any territory that is illegally occupied.

If Brussels takes issue with the ban and tries to fine us for some trumped-up reason like arguing that we're exceeding our reserved competencies, that would initiate legal proceedings which would give us standing to counter and argue that we are only meeting our international obligations as outlined by the UN, and furthermore that the EU-Israel trade deal has a boilerplate clause requiring Israel to meet certain human rights criteria or the entire trade deal goes kaput.

Basically if the EU takes us to court over this, we'll be able to force the argument to be over whether Israel is violating human rights, at which point (because judges are not politicians) the court will almost certainly side with us, which would THEN put Brussels into the legal position where they're OBLIGED to ban these goods EU-wide.

Because Brussels knows this, they're likely to try and avoid initiating proceedings, turning a blind eye. However a lack of consequences for us would embolden other EU members to copy us. Basically it's a rock and a hard place for Brussels.

Just pointing this out so that people see that UN votes DO matter.

[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 4 points 10 hours ago

Love this. So, basically at this point there is an excellent trolling opportunity to be pressuring the Commission to take Ireland to court. Write big grandstanding letters demanding "Irish antisemitism" (lol) not be left without court challenges. Then go to court and get the whole EU-Israel bullshit treaty annulled. Love it.

[–] 3abas@lemm.ee 2 points 12 hours ago

This, among other things happening in the would (not the least of which the whole world making deals with China and leaving the US behind) is why Israel is done.

I give it 3 years before they publically admit 10/7 and the unfolding genocide was their biggest defeat, and by then the rest of the world will have moved on too.

No trade deals, no foreign economy, no sugar daddy US, no more infinite supply of 2,000 lbs bombs to drop on civilians and no more immunity as they shoot pregnant women in the belly and children in the knees for sport. Jewish ISIS will only have their nukes left.

[–] MathGrunt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

I hope you're right, but my cynicism has doubts.

[–] Bravo@eviltoast.org 3 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

Obama's been gone almost a decade at this point and we still have yet to pass this bill because the government always backs down at the last minute in the face of threats from the US that it would "force" US companies to not do business with us. The Dáil (parliament) supports the bill but the cabinet shoots it down. So you're not wrong to be cynical, but every time Israel commits some fresh outrage the pressure grows for the government to pass it or risk losing the next election.

[–] ztwhixsemhwldvka@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago

so... thanks Obama?

[–] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 15 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Given that Ireland is in the EU customs zone, how’s this going to work?

[–] f2sfljLhdtTZ@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

If this is applied in orders made in the country, then in order for imported goods to be circulated in the country, a third party will need to exist. Like a company in Germany buying and reselling to Ireland. There would be no direct purchases. That third party by law in every EU county needs to operate with some profit, no less than 5%. So eventually it will be possible but practically unlikely to have stuff in scale.

For example Israel exports lemons, somewhat cheaply. If there's an added 5% AND it is illegal to do drop shipping from Israel, this will mean that lemons need to be transported to Germany and then "re sold" to Ireland. So in order to have 5% profit, the total price to the consumer can go up to 15% maybe. And that might make sense to import lemons from another country like turkey.

Also have in mind that Ireland is a tax heaven in EU terms. This limits companies that care for their profit A Lot to start looking for alternatives for their procurements.

As for the end consumers, it will be probably more difficult to buy stuff. Ebay, amazon, and generic eshops will not be allowed to ship there things made in Israel.

A side effect is that people will have this rule in their mind, and will make it their belief that we do not collaborate with Israel, which can have an effect on people traveling from there to Ireland. Of course this can cascade to other countries.

[–] Saleh@feddit.org 3 points 1 day ago

Also it gives an angle to investigate such companies for breaking the law and fining them.

Given that the Irish are much more critical of Israel, i am sure there will be a few people looking into these things.

[–] PhobosAnomaly@feddit.uk 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Not very well I should imagine, but it is a symbolic move and the rumblings of things to come from other organisations.

I should imagine direct imports to Ireland from Israel will stop... but as soon as the goods enter the Schengen zone elsewhere, there'll be very little to stop them without controls at the zone entry point (unlikely) or inspections at the Irish border (unlikely again).

Happy to be corrected though.

[–] TheOctonaut@mander.xyz 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Ireland isn't in Schengen.

[–] PhobosAnomaly@feddit.uk 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Well fuck me, every day's a school day. Thank you.

[–] Bravo@eviltoast.org 4 points 16 hours ago

To be specific, Ireland isn't in Schengen because the UK isn't in Schengen and we're trying to keep the border as non-bordery as possible.