this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2026
611 points (97.7% liked)

Fediverse

43083 readers
723 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, Mbin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration)

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/72685299

I discovered this after upgrading our instance yesterday, which also upgraded all frontends to their latest versions as well. After I did, our Tesseract frontend stopped working and I noticed immediately as it's been my primary for a while. Initially I thought it was an API version mismatch, but no, it was much worse.

Someone pointed out that the developer of the frontend added an explicit hidden and unmodifiably blacklist which includes any and all instances to the left of Kissinger. There's a commit which also explains their specious reasoning about our instance specifically, as it seems we've been on their shit list for a bit longer than that.

This instance and its admin staff encourages identity politics, groupthink, mob mentality, and extremist solutions to societal problems. Users who advocate violence are not moderated so long as the admins agree with the target. Caution and critical thinking are advised when interacting with this instance or its users.

When you use tesseract to connect to one blacklisted such instance , you just get a message informing you that Tesseract is "incompatible with that instance" which leads one to think of a technical issue, like an API mismatch, rather than the dev being an opinionated coward.

Isn't it funny how all the software developed by turbolibs, like Piefed and Tesseract, end up with hidden control mechanisms from developers who think they know better than everyone else? That they don't just think they deserve to tell you what you should think, but they should manipulate you to think it? Isn't it funny how libs go on about how bad it is to support lemmy due to the ideology of the devs behind it, and yet lemmy has 0 opinions as a software? It does make one think...

Anyway, I forked - it as one does - and disabled the blacklist, but since this is a massively ideologically compromised software, I'll doubt I'll keep this frontend up after Lemmy 1.0. I think we'll bring up mlmym again now that someone's maintaining it again.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] sudoer777@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Someone needs to make a fork that turns the blacklist into a whitelist

[–] Quokka@quokk.au 3 points 2 hours ago (1 children)
[–] sudoer777@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 hours ago

Yeah but we need whitelist version where all you see is the accounts/posts on the list

[–] dani0tb@lemmus.org 2 points 2 hours ago

didn't know the dev from tesseract was such a loser

[–] Wispy2891@lemmy.world 4 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

did he took down the repo? it gives 404

scared that somebody would fork it? what a loser

[–] ghost_towels@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Too late, already got forked. Can’t remember which user but saw that in another thread.

[–] kieron115@startrek.website 11 points 12 hours ago

it also marks proton mail as throwaway lol

load more comments
view more: next ›