this post was submitted on 14 Jun 2025
31 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

3113 readers
474 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.


Post guidelines

[Opinion] prefixOpinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip


Icon attribution | Banner attribution


If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Google is killing Android Instant Apps, a feature that lets you try mobile apps without installing them, because nobody used them.

top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The idea was pretty dumb, since you could just make a website with all the needed functionality to "instantly load without installation", which too many apps should've been in the first place

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

If only most of these products were about providing a good product and not just a way for them to collect as much data as they can, maybe they would have stayed websites instead of individual apps.

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 1 points 1 day ago

Pretty much. The idea was great, it just limited bad actors too much

[–] surge_1@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

Apps had to be developed in a specific way to support this, and it was a hassle not worth the investment, so most didn't.

[–] Letstakealook@lemm.ee 7 points 1 day ago

I didn't even know this existed until now.