Please update with the [AIT] tag in the title.
Edit: I see that you're active, please update the title as required. Locked in the interim.
this post was submitted on 23 Jul 2026
324 points (98.5% liked)
Selfhosted
60951 readers
570 users here now
A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.
Rules:
-
Be civil.
-
No spam.
-
Posts are to be related to self-hosting.
-
Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or readme if you're providing a link.
-
Submission headline should match the article title.
-
No trolling.
-
Promotion posts require active participation, with an account that is at least 30 days old. F/LOSS without a paywall has exceptions, with requirements. See the rules link for details. Tags [CBH] or [AIP] are required, see the links in Rule 8 for details.
-
AI-related discussions and AI-involved promotional posts have additional requirements for tagging, as noted in Rule 7 and the AI & Promotional Post Expanded Rules post, and find example disclosures here.
Resources:
- selfh.st Newsletter and index of selfhosted software and apps
- awesome-selfhosted software
- awesome-sysadmin resources
- Self-Hosted Podcast from Jupiter Broadcasting
Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.
Questions? DM the mods!
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
What is AIT?
AI Topic. Discussions that involve AI as a main subject, as this one does. If you go to the detailed links in the sidebar, there are full explanations.
Those comments on HN are hilarious 😅 That site really works as a parody of bad tech bro takes if you ignore that most of them are sadly dead serious.
load more comments
(23 replies)
The US specifically has settled on it being (effectively?) public domain.
The US Copyright Office has declared that it would not grant copyright protection to AI-generated material due to a lack of human authorship, but it is very far from being codified by law, nor does it say anything about the ownership of the material.
This is still a problem for OSS licensing, since in order to license a work you need to be the copyright holder.
This might mean that OSS projects find it even more difficult to assert their licenses against violators in court, since they would need to prove that the part of the code that was copied was not AI output.
Banning the output of AI tools in OSS codebases is a sensible move for any project that actually cares about enforcing the license that their code is released under.
At the very least it's a mistake to say the law is "settled" at all. It's barely been tested.
Indeed, this ruling says nothing about something being a derivative work, all it says is that AI generated works can not create new copyright claims, which is totally sensible and non-controversial.
The bigger problem is that AI tools have ingested a lot of copyrighted and FOSS code and totally will use that code in your projects. So even if AI output can't be copyrighted, you are still on the hook if your AI copies copyrighted code into your own project. People will notice if your project just changed the variable names
Yes, that is what the term "derivative work" referrs to.
It means if the guy running Codeberg doesn't like it. This is his fiefdom, not a public square. Make your own fiefdom for AI coding. You could call it Vibeberg.
LMAO! That's hilarious and true. Look, until you own your own platform, with your own rules for said platform, or are a significant investor in said platform, then you are subject to the whims of that platform.
Kinda hilarious how outraged these AI bros get the second someone says no to their worthless slop. How dare they not wanting to be a dumping ground for your LLM extrusions. I always had a low opinion of HN (and Lobsters, which is HN but now in red) but their users really got insufferable in the last few years. Now its just a cesspool of bad takes, anti-intellectualism and unfortunately more and more far-right talking points.
Please add the [AIT] tag - thanks!
view more: next ›