Change my mind.
I write plain text. I just happen to format it like markdown.
this post was submitted on 23 Jul 2026
197 points (88.6% liked)
memes
22080 readers
3759 users here now
Community rules
1. Be civil
No trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour
2. No politics
This is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world
3. No recent reposts
Check for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month
4. No bots
No bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins
5. No Spam/Ads/AI Slop
No advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.
A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment
Sister communities
- !tenforward@lemmy.world : Star Trek memes, chat and shitposts
- !lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world : Lemmy Shitposts, anything and everything goes.
- !linuxmemes@lemmy.world : Linux themed memes
- !comicstrips@lemmy.world : for those who love comic stories.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
Markdown...is...plaintext, though?
Every programming language is plain text.
Not intended to be easily human-readable though.
Sure they are. They're intended to be as easy to read for a human as possible.
No. The primary purpose of programming languages is to be machine-readable first, human-readable second. The primary purpose of both markdown and plaintext is to be equally readable by both humans and machines.
Assembly, perhaps. But not every other language. Every other language's sole purpose is to be easier than assembly to read by humans, so it can be compiled or translated through an engine into something a machine can read.
Machines do not read Rust. Machines do not read C++. Machines do not read JavaScript. Humans do.
yup but with more tricks
Markdown is text that can kick flip
So is HTML
My only objection to that is that its source code isn't easily human-readable, like Markdown's is. The point of an .md file is that a human and a computer can both parse it just as easily as a native format.
Markdown would be better if everyone using it used the same markdown. I swear no two places use it the same.
We could have had that, but when some people who might have succeeded tried to establish a proper standard for Markdown in 2014 the original inventor threw a tantrum so they backed down and it never went anywhere.
https://blog.codinghorror.com/standard-markdown-is-now-common-markdown/
This upsets me.
true though
LaTeX has entered the chat
kick him out.
Sorry, he already embed into all scientific paper.
A quality text file is a bit of a lost art these days. I like looking through this archive of old text files from the 80s and 90s once in a while. http://textfiles.com/directory.html
you will change you mind yourself when your - key breaks from all the
--------------------------------------
HEADINGS
--------------------------------------
load more comments
(4 replies)
I wouldn't dare try to understand the mind that thinks that Markdown is at all like html. 🤷♂️
Isn't markdown a strict superset of html though? As in any valid html is valid markdown. Not usually how it is used though and im not sure about how most markdown flavours handle it, but it is a "convenient" escape hatch
I mean, Markdown was specifically designed to be convertable to HTML. So, it is structurally rather similar. It's basically just a bunch of aliases for a subset of HTML tags.
Having said that, it is also designed to be plain text. You don't have to convert it, and even when you do convert it, there's a good chance that what you've written in plain text will look fine in converted Markdown as well.
For the purposes of this meme, I would certainly group it with plain text.
They are both at the end of the day UTF-8 text.
Behold the holy Grail of text structuring and formatting (as long as you don't want to deal with LaTeX): orgmode
Typst, Perchance
I need to get into Typst. Been hearing about it a lot for a good while.
I checked Typst out a bit. It couldn't do a specific, niche thing I want to do but in general it felt really nice. Definitely feels newer than LaTeX and with less technical debt/baggage. A bit more limited but still nice
And for some reason it seems there's no community for Typst on Threadiverse
Thank you for sharing! I haven't even looked at it yet — I imagine it's like a supercharged Markdown, with ways to interlink documents and that kind of jazz? Am I way off?
I'd rather say it's a cross between the two. Because most of the text is written like MD but then it does have document settings and tables look like in LaTeX
Looks beautiful, wow. Very simple. I so wish I had this through my uni days. LaTeX was pretty powerful but it was pretty painful sometimes as well.
The orgmode site doesn't display properly on my phone. I can't even scroll horizontally to read the text. 😂
emacs heretic! begone from this place!
It is absolutely worth it learning it.
how do i use emacs without vim emulation
Graphite pencil and paper is God
pointy stick and dirt clearing or gtfo
load more comments
(2 replies)
(Trivia: the Assembly code I made for the last panel does work)
They're almost the same thing, so this kinda' hits like two people arguing over which shitbox $300 car they drive is faster...
load more comments
(1 replies)
Ngl plain txt is the best . But not for writing blog . Need something like # for headings and stuff . To make my blog portable i don't use mardow much just # for heading and # for tag
Markdown is so annoying. I wanted to record a command in Joplin and had the audacity to make it bold to highlight something. Pasted it into their terminal and it put a bunch of asterisks in. Thanks.
load more comments
(2 replies)
view more: next ›