this post was submitted on 18 Jun 2025
301 points (98.4% liked)

Progressive Politics

2827 readers
535 users here now

Welcome to Progressive Politics! A place for news updates and political discussion from a left perspective. Conservatives and centrists are welcome just try and keep it civil :)

(Sidebar still a work in progress post recommendations if you have them such as reading lists)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

He told the New York Times that he thinks the U.S. will “very likely” find itself in a three-front war with China, Russia, and Iran. As a result, he said, the Pentagon should continue developing autonomous weapons at full speed, pointing to big mismatches in how far the U.S. would be willing to go while fighting a war compared with other countries.

Source

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] wanderwisley@lemm.ee 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And at home, America will eventually fight against America.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmings.world 4 points 1 day ago

No, America will fight against traitors.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmings.world 3 points 1 day ago

Ridiculous. There is no possible way that HitlerPig will go to war against Russia. What is far more likely, is that he abandons NATO, and signs a pact with Russia, China, and North Korea.

As a show of good faith, we will surrender Taiwan to China, and Alaska to Russia (establishing a Russian military presence in our hemisphere, on our landmass), and in exchange, we can have Canada and Mexico.

HitlerPig would consider that a good deal.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 58 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'd rather fight a one front war against palantir

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Hlodwig@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Lol nah, China is winning by a long margin in this neo-capitalistic world, no way they are going to war against US. They have all the time in the world to regain Taïwan.

[–] scott@lemmy.org 73 points 2 days ago (17 children)

He's also got plenty of financial incentive to say shit like that. War on all 3 of those fronts would be so untenable with the state of things and he knows that which is why he's advocating for more drones but really? How realistic is that? China's drones are at least as advanced as ours

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago

You know this fucking guy loathes himself

[–] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 day ago

He says shit like this to juice his stock and defense contracts.

[–] imsufferableninja@sh.itjust.works 33 points 2 days ago (10 children)

What makes him think we're going to fight Russia? Mango Mussolini loves Russia.

[–] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 days ago

Yeah Hitler “loved” Russia for a minute too

[–] barkingspiders@infosec.pub 6 points 2 days ago

In some sense our large contributions to Ukraine earlier in the war could be seen as us fighting Russia via proxy. If I recall correctly our involvement with conflicts in Syria were also seen similarly, as us fighting a Russian proxy state. My understanding is that war between nuclear powers often looks like this because all out war could escalate to nuclear weapons too quickly. All this to say, I think we were already at war with Russia before Trump regained office.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

10 months ago*

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

Not to mention China seems to choose the most economical decision it seems. They care about Taiwan strictly because of money. There is no economic growth for them from fighting the U.S.

[–] MintyFresh@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago

I disagree about Taiwan. That's a thing that goes back to the founding of modern China, it is, and has been a cornerstone of their policy. But otherwise ya, they seem to make rational economic choices.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] sexy_peach@feddit.org 4 points 2 days ago

Also they're in no shape to fight

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] ArchmageAzor@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago (5 children)

The US could probably take on Russia and Iran without much effort, but isn't China's military actually comparable to the US'?

[–] Rakonat@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

China considers itself a regional power, and doesn't delude itself into calling itself a world power like Russia does. So it's unlikely they'd direct any strikes at CONUS if a war broke out. They would instead try to force all US/allied influences out of their sphere of influence and just play the defensive game until some kind of peace could be negotiated.

They have aspirations to become a global power in the next century and possibly could do it, the real question is do they intend to share the stage with the US or find ways to erode US power down to regional power and rise up to take their place?

[–] Pieisawesome@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 days ago

I think that if a war was to break out, it would be like US vs Japan in WW2. Except we would be Japan and China would be the US.

The Japanese had superior weapons and ships, but were unable to replace losses in a timely fashion, leading to being dominant in the beginning of the war, but once the US manufacturing base started producing weapons and ships, the Japanese were quickly overwhelmed and unable to keep up.

In tech, yes. In expenditure; no.

But they arent as much of a violently corrupt politically theatrical shit show, so id put it at roughly even odds.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] tortina_original@lemmy.world 20 points 2 days ago

Lunatics are truly running the asylum.

[–] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I mean, George Dubbya kinda let this one slip back in the 2000s.

[–] rodneyck@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 2 days ago

Yes he did, the New World Order plans.

[–] mhague@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago

So the guy who runs the AI intelligence corporation thinks the West is morally superior to the degree that more amoral, barbarous countries like China and Russia and Iran have some advantage over us.

Like it's just sensitive and soft westerners fighting against robotic Asians and Russians. Iranians are so evil compared to us: they're willing to use nukes!

[–] Hello_there@fedia.io 11 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Because 3 way wars are easy to win.

[–] CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social 5 points 2 days ago (5 children)

Especially when one of the opponents has several times our population and all opponents are oceans away, besides two of the three being nuclear armed and the third being close. Even with the size of our military, I don't think that's a war we would stand a reasonable chance in.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

The United States military strength has, until very recently, been focused on the ability to successfully prosecute war on two major fronts and one minor front.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 days ago

Psychopaths

[–] Jimmycakes@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If we can't clean up Iran quickly there's gonna be a no front war because China will roll us

[–] ghosthacked@lemmy.wtf 2 points 2 days ago

Bet you China has some checkmate against carriers they'll pull from their sleeve if things go hot.

Chinese think many steps ahead so they won't escalate until victory is very likely.

[–] LustyArgonianMana@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

Something something BRICS

load more comments
view more: next ›