this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2026
606 points (96.5% liked)

memes

22390 readers
1960 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 176 points 2 weeks ago (12 children)

A bidet, you should buy a bidet.

[–] renegadespork@lemmy.jelliefrontier.net 86 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

And use a calculator ffs it comes free with whatever device you’re using to ask a chatbot.

[–] TheFinn@discuss.tchncs.de 39 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

People have to know how to create the math problem then. Schools are really falling down here

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world 34 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

How do I type the prompt on the calculator?? I can only type numbers???

[–] MonkeMischief@lemmy.today 24 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Heehee you can type words, like

8008135

:D

[–] protist@retrofed.com 12 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] trem@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

You can also get a travel bidet, if you can't permanently install one, or just want to try it out. It's basically just a squeeze bottle with a nozzle...

[–] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Standing in the shower and spreading your asscheeks is still free

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[–] Vespair@lemmy.zip 153 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

I know this is a meme, but for the record math is one of the things LLMs are famously worst at

[–] taiyang@lemmy.world 64 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Can confirm; I teach statistics and allow take home exams. I don't even really need guardrails on the math-- if you cheat via LLM, your answer is almost always hilariously wrong.

[–] Mika@piefed.ca 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I've not used gpt for quite a while, but can't you ask to python script the evaluation?

[–] EnsignWashout@startrek.website 25 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

For simple math that could work, and as long as the question is close enough to an exact match with plenty of published examples to copy.

A good rule of thumb is that the script it will come up with is about as likely to be correct as blindly taking the highest voted answer to the most similar question on Stack Overflow.

If the question is simple and common, the odds are quite good. If the question is nuanced or rare, the odds of a correct result drop off aggressively.

Edit: Your mileage may vary - providing an API to these LLMs that can do math correctly for them is pretty easy. Getting the LLM to consistently detect when to use that API is more challenging.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Gormadt@slrpnk.net 46 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Yesterday I literally had to count 14 thousand pounds of fire extinguishers (as in count each extinguisher in a bunch of crates), one of my coworkers came over and said "Why don't you just use AI to count them." They then pulled out their phone, took a picture, asked AI to count them, and was off buy almost 60% on the first crate. Then went "oh, well that's just one example,"

They then tried 4 more times, being between 75% and 50% off each time. They then went "Oh, well, ummm, nevermind." and wandered off again.

(I had to count the extinguishers to make a Bill of Lading for them for shipping them out, you need an accurate count otherwise it will be held by the shipping company until you provide a correct BoL with the correct count due to legal reasons. I couldn't just weigh them and divide the total wieght by the weight of a single extinguisher as they were a bunch of different sizes mixed together. NGL it was the easiest money I've ever made at the at job.)

[–] HCSOThrowaway@lemmy.world 31 points 2 weeks ago

$10 says they still think AI is great at counting things.

[–] Atherel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

NGL it was the easiest money I've ever made at the at job

Easy money for you. For me that work would have been torture.

[–] Gormadt@slrpnk.net 17 points 2 weeks ago

Oh it sucked for sure, I kept getting interrupted which meant whatever crate I was counting at the time had to be started over.

But the biggest perk was not having to deal with the other idiots on our loading dock for the entire time I was counting.

Though I've joked about it in the past I really should get a shirt that says "I'm trying to focus on my job, please don't distract me" or something like that.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Jax@sh.itjust.works 58 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I just got into a little spat with my friends fiance because she intellectually offloads with AI.

I stand by it.

[–] theparadox@lemmy.world 51 points 2 weeks ago (8 children)

The number of people I know who now ask AI instead of web searching is... very upsetting.

[–] Damage@feddit.it 41 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Doesn't help that web search is shit nowadays

[–] arin@lemmy.world 18 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

That might be intentional and also coz of the shitty ai blog/info sites

[–] natecox@programming.dev 13 points 2 weeks ago

In the case of Google it is very much intentional, and documented. Good search means fewer search attempts and that means fewer displayed ads.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Kirp123@lemmy.world 15 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

If you search Google just serves you their AI shit. The other day their AI told me the word "rainy" has 4 letters.

[–] dream_weasel@sh.itjust.works 20 points 2 weeks ago

It's does have 4 letters. It has 5 letters too.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] not@lemmy.dbzer0.com 38 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Poop at work, get paid while pooping and use free tp.

[–] TwistedTurtle@sh.itjust.works 17 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Their tp is all scratchy and thin though...

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 29 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world 16 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

And now you have 35 papercuts and shit on your hand

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 21 points 2 weeks ago (11 children)

This actually isn't too hard to solve. Double the value of each option by removing the folding requirement from the 2-ply and halving the price of the 3-ply to get an even comparison of 2-ply (330 sheets for $0.70) and 3-ply (300 sheets for $0.60), then recognize that it's not worth adding 1/6 the price for 1/10th the sheets, to see that the 3-ply option is better.

By the first sentence, you’ve already done more problem solving than an LLM-brained person.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] SpookyBogMonster@lemmy.ml 20 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Incorrect, I would rather die before asking Chat GPT anything

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] AndyMFK@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

You guys don't have unit pricing? In Australia it's required by law that supermarkets show price per standard unit of measurement so you can easily compare

[–] awfulawful@lemmy.blahaj.zone 26 points 2 weeks ago

We do! What's really helpful is many products of the same category are in different units. One will be per sheet, one per roll, one per 100 sheets, one per 500 sheets... and then the true thickness is completely different, so 1 ply for one brand will hold up ok while another will start disintegrating the moment you pull it off the roll. Do you feel free yet?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 16 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (3 children)

Two ply 70¢ / (330/2) = 0.42 ¢

Three ply 120¢ / 300 = 0.4 ¢

Basically the same.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] _stranger_@lemmy.world 13 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

"You've spent 3x the theoretical savings asking me this question"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

That comes out to 0.004242 per doubled-up 2-ply sheet vs 0.004 per 3-ply sheet

[–] dil@piefed.zip 10 points 2 weeks ago

Its extra fucked because the sheer amount of money ppl at the top have now, like the gap is getting bigger and bigger, why is everyone still broke, how do they benefit from ppl not buying things, like my walmart is full of expired sht all the time now, way less traffix

[–] Jumi@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

I shit and shower at work, not simultaneously though

Tap for spoilermost of the time

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›