this post was submitted on 04 Aug 2026
478 points (95.1% liked)

No Stupid Questions

50023 readers
318 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

How bad do we let things get? Should we wait until the planet can't sustain life anymore? Should we wait until it's 100 degrees F in the Artic? Until wildfires blanket entire continents or the last glacier is gone? Should we wait until fascist billionaires take even more from us? Until there are Flock cameras at every mail box? Maybe we should wait until the wells run dry or the tornadoes never stop. When is it going to be enough? I'm so tired of seeing things getting worse. Every. Single. Day. I'm ready. I've been ready. How about you?

How do we coordinate? How do we look after each other? What is the signal? If we don't work together then we are just continuing our slow march to destruction to the drum of the parasitic billionaires. Please, for us, for the cats, the dogs, the birds and trees. The fish and the whales, the beatles and the centipedes. Please tell me it's worth it to you, that you're willing to get uncomfortable, that you're willing to fight. There are more of us than them, and we are rapidly running out of time to make that mean something.

(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

most countries have given up on climate change, with all the propaganda that the oil/gas pushed helped too. deforestation is a big problem in tropical areas, where the biodiversity is very high, and not because of the "charismatic megafauna" , theres a group of types plants that are extremely susceptible as they usually only found in one or few locations(mycohetereotrophs) and are easily extirpated or extinct, if you even disturb that small area of the forest.(see americas own Thismia species, people have been trying to find this rare plant for 100+years). there is a related on in japan, that was though to have been extinct for 30 years only to be rediscovered.

[–] moncharleskey@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

They've given up because we've allowed them to do so. Complacency is our worst enemy here, and the people that stand to profit from further polluting our planet know that they just need to wait for the masses to turn away for them to continue pillagingour future. We can't turn away, we have to be resilient, and we have to work together.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] OriginEnergySux@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I would say the left and the right need to reach common ground on the issue - but like someone else said: "when the bread runs out"

[–] moncharleskey@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Surprisingly, Flock cameras seem to be a unifying force between left and right, everybody seems to hate them. That's an in road, maybe we can finally come together on other common goals like fighting corruption and billionaire elites.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Abyssian@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

The problem is that we still want to live through it.

In our imaginations it's everyone rising up against tyranny and oligarchy and demanding a better world. It's us seeing the change happen and getting to that better world. We want the world to be better because we want better. We want a fair chance to own a nice home and live a decent life without constant worry. We want to be able to afford basic health care. To not be forced to pay thousands of dollars for 'health insurance' and then still be hit with hundreds of thousands in bills if we actually have a serious medical issue. To be able to go to a hospital for one night to give birth to a child without ending up $10k in debt for doing it. We want to know that justice exists and the people in power aren't raping and murdering kids and then laughing when we demand justice. That they aren't throwing poor people who can't afford to defend themselves in for-profit prisons for crimes they didn't commit so they can be used for slave labor.

We want to live, and to have life be something we enjoy and love instead of endless struggle and stress. We want to see the change happen, to experience how amazing and different things can be.

We want to live through it.

Most of us aren't willing to die for it. To walk away from every thing you have, right now. Every belonging, every relationship. To stand up and walk away from all of it expecting to never see any of it again. Expecting to die. But willing to do that to make the world a better place for other people. For your children, or their children.

It's common to hear people saying they don't have or want kids because of the state of things we all hate so much. Making the world a better place for your children is one of the biggest reasons people are motivated to give up their own lives to force a rotten system to change.

We want deaths like Alex Pretti and Renee Good suffered to stop. We don't want to be the next people at the wrong end of the gun.

Revolutions aren't without cost. Usually very high cost. It takes a lot of people being willing to die, expecting to die, planning to die, and deciding that it's worth it just for the chance to make things better for the future.

No revolution ever fixes everything. There are still problems and injustices and wrongs after every one of them. There is no guarantee that you standing up and walking out of your entire life, to go fight the system and die, will change anything at all. It might not work. Enough other people might not stand up for it to make even a tiny difference. Even if enough people do, it might not end up in a very big difference in the end. There's a chance that it could cause big changes. That a lot of the worst parts of today would actually improve. But that's only a chance, while there's a complete guarantee that it would never lead to some idyllic utopia where everything is all batter.

You will almost definitely die. You won't even know if it makes any difference in the end. All you'll have is that hope that maybe it will, and maybe things will really be better for future generations.

Are you actually ready? Are you standing up, moncharleskey? It's easy to type. It's not easy to do. The answer to what you're waiting for it simple. You're waiting for you to decide that the mere chance, the hope, that in rising up and almost certainly dying for it you will manage to make a difference and make the world a better place is worth walking away from your entire life and expecting to die.

Until you hit that point inside, until you're willing to stand up on the spot and give away your own life, you will keep sitting.

[–] moncharleskey@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I am ready, I've been ready, but I'm not going to pull some lone wolf bullshit that gets me killed and leave my wife and kids to deal with the fallout. The bigger question here is are you ready? I need allies. Are you one, or are you another complacent?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (4 children)

You want to riot to fix climate change? Ok, let's say you will get everyone to riot, abolish the government and kill the elites. What will you do next to solve climate change?

Ban* cars? People will be against it. Ban beef? People will be against it. Ban air travel? You guessed it, people will be against it. Majority of people support measures that they think will not affect them like carbon taxes and renewable energy but if you look at actual, consumer level changes you will see a big drop. Only 34% of drivers support ban on ICE cars.

Look how much people bitch about paper straws. You think they will agree to actually limiting CO2 emissions by using less energy, traveling less, eating less meat and buying less useless stuff? The problem are not just the the elites and the billionaires. WE are the problem.

10% richest people account for half of the emissions. To be in the top 10% you have to make over $30k a year. To stop climate change pretty much everyone on lemmy would have to agree to big sacrifices. Are you ready to significantly lower your quality of life or you just want to riot because you think it will help you save it?

*By ban I mean limit by making more expensive.

[–] notabot@piefed.social 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I think you've pretty much hit the nail on the head here, most people don't want to sacrifice what they have for the "greater good", even if they intellectually know it is necessary to avoid losing even more.

As I see it, there are two ways of dealing with this; either the government forces people to make those changes, which would be massively unpopular, and probably lead to the government falling, or we find ways to make the necessary changes without people having to make massive sacrifices. This would probably involve things like a worldwide push to renewable energy sources, replacing ICE based transport with electric, likewise replacing industrial processes with non-emitting versions, finding ways to grow meat protein in an industrial process rather than farming it, and miriad other big changes.

It would be a massive endeavour, involving international coordination, major infrastructure projects, and a certain amount of state imposed industrial planning, but I think it would still be easier than getting everyone to give up the things they like.

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 3 points 2 months ago (3 children)

EU is pretty much doing what you're describing: it has some (weak but still) EV transition plan, it's pushing hydrogen (to de-carbonize industries), it's installing a lot of renewables. I would say they doing as much as people and industries are letting them. Push any harder and industries will move, people will lose their jobs and you will see even more discontent. And doing more would cost money which would mean higher taxes or less investment which people would also not like. We could tax the rich but this also isn't very likely as there will always be a place for them to hide their money in (if not US than Russia or Argentina).

This is how it's going:

This is what "best effort" gets us right now. Even if by some miracle all other countries started doing the same (and as we know US for example is doing the exact opposite) we would see 50 more years of emissions. This is obviously not going to happen so we're pretty much fucked. Rioting will definitely not change any of that.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 3 points 2 months ago

oil/gas already pacified protests, demostration agains global warming for a while now. they funded all these companies so they dont have to , plus they fund the protests themselves that vandalize publicproperty to get the public to side against them.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›