this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2026
428 points (94.4% liked)

memes

22253 readers
3624 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 11 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Thanos could have doubled the amount of space and resouces in the universe just as easily.

[–] P00ptart@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago

Just to get swallowed up by the same 1%?

[–] Flower@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

It doesn't matter one way or the other. Let's say there's a 1% growth rate of the population. That means you're back to the original population in 70 years. Or doubled the resource use.

[–] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Since he has infinite power, he could have just made it so capacity constantly increases with population.

As you said, either way, it is a flawed premise.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 8 points 5 days ago (1 children)

There was this book about a fertility reducing virus.

[–] irish_link@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] WanderWisley@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

One thing that always got to me with Thanos and all the infinity stones bs is why didn’t he just make the universe 1% bigger?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 7 points 5 days ago (5 children)

Actually scientists in the 1970s were saying we need to do what we can to stabilize AT the 4 billion we were at then. See Limits to Growth and related studies. Cutting back now would help, but far more damage has been caused thanks to everything we've done including but not limited to population pressures than if we had heeded the warnings then and changed our direction. Some feedbacks are probably unstoppable now, no matter what we cut back.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Nofearfrontier@lemmy.world 7 points 5 days ago

Are these scientists with us on the room right now?

[–] sangeteria@lemmy.ml 3 points 4 days ago

Do we? Cuz like, I'm willing to go

[–] jim_v@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago

Halve Life 4b confirmed.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 2 points 4 days ago

are the avengers going to say thier sorry for thanos.

[–] lan@meetiko.org 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] laurenceOfSuburbia@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

bro its a meme for light chuckles. nobody said that seriously.

[–] lan@meetiko.org 2 points 5 days ago

@laurenceOfSuburbia@lemmy.world let's make memes of halving (decimating?) billionare population instead, then :)

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 1 points 4 days ago

Its literally a busload of people and we know their names

[–] Balldowern@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

Prepare for nuclear war folks.

[–] sirico@feddit.uk 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 1 points 3 days ago

The problem with just deleting half of the living people is it does nothing to curb the systems that brought the planet to ecological collapse. In such a scenario people would almost definitely fill the void left with even more excess since there's now more breathing room and resources to use excessively. It would not take long, probably less than a century to return to the exact same situation such a magical solution was used to solve

[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 0 points 3 days ago

There’s a whole hemisphere that hasn’t been pulling its own weight. Crack.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›