this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2025
133 points (97.8% liked)

Technology

71922 readers
3961 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

By 25 July, all sites and apps that allow pornography – whether they are dedicated adult sites or social media, search or gaming services – must use highly effective age checks to ensure children are not normally able to encounter it. Online firms who publish their own pornography are already required to protect children from it, and thousands of sites have already introduced robust age checks in response. 

Major porn providers operating in the UK have confirmed to Ofcom that they will introduce effective checks by next month’s deadline in order to comply with the new rules. They include PornHub, the most-visited pornographic service in the UK. Other services who are happy to be named at this stage include BoyfriendTV, Cam4, FrolicMe, inxxx, Jerkmate, LiveHDCams, MyDirtyHobby, RedTube, Streamate, Stripchat, Tube8, and YouPorn. This represents a broad range of pornography services accessed in the UK.

Monitoring compliance with these new duties is a priority for Ofcom. If any company fails to comply with its new duties, Ofcom can impose fines and – in very serious cases – apply for a court order to prevent the site or app from being available in the UK. As part of our work enforcing the Online Safety Act, we have already launched investigations into four porn providers and won’t hesitate to take further action from July.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] gwilikers@lemmy.ml 1 points 27 minutes ago

Do we know how the age verification process is gonna work or is this gonna be one of those neoliberal dystopian spystate kinda deals where the means of data collection is left to corporations only to be subsequently tapped by the state when the want to target individuals?

[–] addie@feddit.uk 4 points 1 hour ago

So all of the mainstream porn will be blocked, leaving all of the niche and special-interest stuff available? Excellent, excellent...

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 32 points 10 hours ago

If UK really wanted to protect the kids, they would've jailed Transphobe JK Rowings for hate crime

[–] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 24 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (2 children)

Oh no. Some hackers hacked out database and released all the ID information on high profile people. Oh such whoopsie, we made.

  • Adult Websites
[–] YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today 1 points 5 hours ago

I seriously feel this. I've found a little site that dgaf what country or state you're in. I use a VPN if I want a change.

[–] JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz 3 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

Depends entirely on how it's implemented, because the website doesn't need to know who you are, only verify that you are over 18. Which can be done reasonably securely - you generate a random ID on a secure service (e.g here in Finland, we use our online banking stuff for official verification purposes), give that ID to the website, and the only communication between the two of them is "Is id 123 valid and an adult? Yes/No".

Now, if that "secure service", most likely a government contract done as cheaply as possible turns out not to be, and they keep logs linking those IDs to the URLs requesting verification, then the entire thing goes belly up.

[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 4 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

So your bank now knows you accessed certain websites. And likely one or more middleware services. And you are okay with that?

[–] JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz 3 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

Was an example of the security, not who is running the service. But I mean, guess who knows if you pay for OnlyFans or stuff like that?
Your bank.

And like I said, it's only really secure if the service doesn't keep a database of logs connecting the two.

[–] MiyamotoKnows@lemmy.world 13 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Garbage. This info will be weaponized by anyone who is willing to buy it.

[–] gwilikers@lemmy.ml 1 points 33 minutes ago

Absolutely. Super easy to use this in blackmail. Especially in a country as repressed as the UK.

[–] MetalMachine@feddit.nl -3 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

People are not gonna agree with me but, it makes sense to have age verification just like you have to verify your age for tobacco or alcohol.

[–] Maxxie@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Is there a paper linking gooning to cancer, why would you compare those things

[–] RepleteLocum@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 33 minutes ago (1 children)

I don’t agree with him, but there are certainly health issues stemming from porn consumption.
Be it ed, or a mental health issue.

[–] Maxxie@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 22 minutes ago

In what world is that risk comparable to cigarettes?

Even comparing it to junk food is a stretch, and nobody suggests we put age verification on chips.

[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 8 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Would it make sense for alcohol age verification if every household had beer taps installed? Because thats what internet is.

[–] MetalMachine@feddit.nl -2 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

Its certainly the parents responsibility to make sure those kids dont drink. And if they do, there should be repercussions just like we have the same expectations with Gun use.

But it's disanalgous anyways. We make stores and establishments check for IDs. These websites are no different from these establishments, therefore they should also verify the age.

[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 0 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Its disingenuous to compare information flow to physical markets. They're not the same thing.

[–] MetalMachine@feddit.nl 0 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Yeah porn is definitely just "information flow", there's nothing beyond it and it can't affect minor individuals. Really? That's not disingenuous? So online gambling shouldn't be age restricted? There's no "physical" aspect to it.

Oh let's not forget, it certainly doesn't objectify women.

[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 1 points 34 minutes ago

I mean it literally is just information flow - no? Doesn't mean it can't be harmful or dangerous but thats what it is and you equating to actions like gambling just show how's actually ignorant you are being here. Have a good day and don't reply to me thanks.

[–] jasoman@lemmy.world 27 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

So much for being better than the US. Welcome to the downfall of modern society UK.

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 3 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

It's been happening for decades.

[–] jasoman@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago

Indeed, it has been the same here.

[–] Petter1@lemm.ee 47 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (2 children)

“PrOtEcT ThE ChiLdReN! 👆🏻🥴”

I can not hear that anymore!

Children need awareness, rather than shielding, concealment and tabooing.

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 9 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

silver lining, the kinks of the future are gonna be sooo fucked up.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 7 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

"I showed you my elbow, pls respond 🥺"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] letsgo2themall@lemmy.world 56 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

mastodon has porn and you don't even need an account to use search. also, this will just drive people to use sketchy sites that won't follow the rules.

[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 7 points 3 hours ago

You can literally find porn on search engines. Google images is a bit restrictive but Bing, Duckduckgo etc will straight up show porn in the image or video searches.

[–] 7112@lemmy.world 97 points 22 hours ago (3 children)

This feel strangely like it has little to do with actually protecting kids...

[–] 0x0@lemmy.zip 90 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

It's more about penetrating your privacy but think of the children is the go-to argument to sugar-coat that.

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 29 points 21 hours ago (4 children)

Someone should be asking what the sentence will be for kids who commit identity fraud and use someone else's ID to set up an account. It may flip the narrative to point out they are intentionally creating more criminal acts that will get kids in trouble with the law and possibly ruin lives.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Ushmel@lemmy.world 13 points 18 hours ago

It's about making LGBTQ content "adult only" and using this same mechanism to enforce ID law on that content. They've been doing it in some USA states for a few years now. No one wants to be the Porn Politician that votes against it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Armand1@lemmy.world 43 points 20 hours ago

If your kid has half a brain he'll do what we did as kids when porn sites were blocked on the home WiFi: He'll just get a VPN.

And when VPN websites were blocked on the home WiFi, we'd just download their apps on mobile data.

Where there's a will, there's a way.

Better to educate your kids on their natural urges and letting them use the more moderated sites than have them go down the more dodgy rabbitholes. No kink shaming but some of the things people do are nasty.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 54 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

I'm disappointed that Pornhub is apparently capitulating instead of blocking access entirely in protest, like they've done in other jurisdictions.

[–] Endymion_Mallorn@kbin.melroy.org 17 points 20 hours ago

I think they realized that they won't get the jurisdiction to bend on this one, and the general response from UK government will be "good riddance to bad rubbish".

[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 8 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

They only really block access when there isn't an official way to validate. Iirc, Louisiana did this over a year ago and pornhub is doing age verification there now.

[–] ieatpwns@lemmy.world 33 points 19 hours ago

VPN subs will be up and UK viewership will be nonexistent

[–] TheLeadenSea@sh.itjust.works 38 points 22 hours ago

So people too young or too privacy conscious to use those major platforms will move to nicher porn sites. Doesn't sound like a bad idea at all... /s

[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 17 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

Are they going to add a box to enter your age like on Steam that you immediately roll back to 1st January 1901?

[–] peaceful_world_view@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

6/9/1969....every time

[–] Ushmel@lemmy.world 9 points 18 hours ago

They did this in Florida. They want you to submit a picture of yourself and your photo ID to a porn website

[–] cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 22 points 21 hours ago (4 children)

don't the uk have a history of straight up putting porn in print magazines and on free television every day?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] devolution@lemmy.world 19 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Say it with me folks! VPN!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sentient_loom@sh.itjust.works 10 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

So what privacy will I have to give up?

Actually I'm in Canada so I'm probably safe anyway.

I mean... I don't watch porn so this doesn't affect my anyway...

It’s tied to your account on the website. So it’s tied to all of your viewing activity. It could be leaked or compromised. It could be subpoenaed. It could be purchased.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MurrayL@lemmy.world 14 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

So this will affect Reddit and Lemmy too, presumably?

[–] TORFdot0@lemmy.world 16 points 20 hours ago

It already has. Lemmy.zip if unavailable to users (of the admins own volition as they don’t have the capability to comply) in the Uk because of the law

load more comments
view more: next ›