this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2025
148 points (98.1% liked)

Technology

71922 readers
3755 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

By 25 July, all sites and apps that allow pornography – whether they are dedicated adult sites or social media, search or gaming services – must use highly effective age checks to ensure children are not normally able to encounter it. Online firms who publish their own pornography are already required to protect children from it, and thousands of sites have already introduced robust age checks in response. 

Major porn providers operating in the UK have confirmed to Ofcom that they will introduce effective checks by next month’s deadline in order to comply with the new rules. They include PornHub, the most-visited pornographic service in the UK. Other services who are happy to be named at this stage include BoyfriendTV, Cam4, FrolicMe, inxxx, Jerkmate, LiveHDCams, MyDirtyHobby, RedTube, Streamate, Stripchat, Tube8, and YouPorn. This represents a broad range of pornography services accessed in the UK.

Monitoring compliance with these new duties is a priority for Ofcom. If any company fails to comply with its new duties, Ofcom can impose fines and – in very serious cases – apply for a court order to prevent the site or app from being available in the UK. As part of our work enforcing the Online Safety Act, we have already launched investigations into four porn providers and won’t hesitate to take further action from July.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] gwilikers@lemmy.ml 10 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Do we know how the age verification process is gonna work or is this gonna be one of those neoliberal dystopian spystate kinda deals where the means of data collection is left to corporations only to be subsequently tapped by the state when the want to target individuals?

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 5 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Well it's been monitored by ofcom who we all know are the last word in inefficiency, corruption, and stupidity so I'm going to go ahead and guess that they're just going to say they're doing checks, and Ofcom just not going to check.

They're probably going to add a second pop-up after the "are you 18" pop-up that says "are you lying".

[–] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 hours ago

I wonder what a fake beard or mustache does as far as fooling the machine goes?

[–] addie@feddit.uk 8 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

So all of the mainstream porn will be blocked, leaving all of the niche and special-interest stuff available? Excellent, excellent...

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 2 points 3 hours ago

Interestingly there are noticeable absences from that list.

Perhaps that's by design, there's no reason the politicians would make their own lives more difficult.

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 37 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

If UK really wanted to protect the kids, they would've jailed Transphobe JK Rowings for hate crime

[–] daggermoon@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

The UK is transphobic too though.

[–] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 30 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (3 children)

Oh no. Some hackers hacked out database and released all the ID information on high profile people. Oh such whoopsie, we made.

  • Adult Websites
[–] echodot@feddit.uk 2 points 3 hours ago

I'm sure the most rigorous of data safety standards will be followed. After all they're being forced to do this I'm sure they won't take the cheapest possible route. Oh definitely not.

[–] JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz 7 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

Depends entirely on how it's implemented, because the website doesn't need to know who you are, only verify that you are over 18. Which can be done reasonably securely - you generate a random ID on a secure service (e.g here in Finland, we use our online banking stuff for official verification purposes), give that ID to the website, and the only communication between the two of them is "Is id 123 valid and an adult? Yes/No".

Now, if that "secure service", most likely a government contract done as cheaply as possible turns out not to be, and they keep logs linking those IDs to the URLs requesting verification, then the entire thing goes belly up.

[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 6 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

So your bank now knows you accessed certain websites. And likely one or more middleware services. And you are okay with that?

[–] JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz 6 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

Was an example of the security, not who is running the service. But I mean, guess who knows if you pay for OnlyFans or stuff like that?
Your bank.

And like I said, it's only really secure if the service doesn't keep a database of logs connecting the two.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

The bank doesn't know what people pay for, or who it goes to, they just know what account you paid into. They would have to go through and verify who owns the account and that's not an automatic process. Finding out the actual person or company behind an account requires effort, so unless there's some investigation that involves that bank account, they won't have that information.

[–] jnod4@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

🤡🤡🤡Lmao what? The amount of men calling up for some transaction error and I need to bring their account up and we can see EVERYTHING, the tinder premium subscriptions, the balding pills, the only fans. There's full access to the whole bank statements up until the account creation at the click of a button

There's been countless cases of bank tellers being fired for looking up their friends and exes to look up what is in their banks

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 1 points 1 hour ago

No, come on, don't be disingenuous, you know that's not what I meant.

If I pay something to, Acme financial services LLC, you have no idea what that really is. They could make boxes, sports equipment, that could be an escort agency, you don't know. Pretty much every adult store is not going to have Sex Toys R Us, as their account name.

[–] YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today 1 points 9 hours ago

I seriously feel this. I've found a little site that dgaf what country or state you're in. I use a VPN if I want a change.

[–] MiyamotoKnows@lemmy.world 15 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Garbage. This info will be weaponized by anyone who is willing to buy it.

[–] gwilikers@lemmy.ml -2 points 4 hours ago

Absolutely. Super easy to use this in blackmail. Especially in a country as repressed as the UK.

[–] Petter1@lemm.ee 49 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (2 children)

“PrOtEcT ThE ChiLdReN! 👆🏻🥴”

I can not hear that anymore!

Children need awareness, rather than shielding, concealment and tabooing.

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 9 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

silver lining, the kinks of the future are gonna be sooo fucked up.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 7 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

"I showed you my elbow, pls respond 🥺"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jasoman@lemmy.world 28 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

So much for being better than the US. Welcome to the downfall of modern society UK.

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 4 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

It's been happening for decades.

[–] jasoman@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago

Indeed, it has been the same here.

[–] letsgo2themall@lemmy.world 58 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

mastodon has porn and you don't even need an account to use search. also, this will just drive people to use sketchy sites that won't follow the rules.

[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 8 points 6 hours ago

You can literally find porn on search engines. Google images is a bit restrictive but Bing, Duckduckgo etc will straight up show porn in the image or video searches.

[–] 7112@lemmy.world 100 points 1 day ago (3 children)

This feel strangely like it has little to do with actually protecting kids...

[–] 0x0@lemmy.zip 93 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It's more about penetrating your privacy but think of the children is the go-to argument to sugar-coat that.

[–] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

Well they should at least give me a reach around if they are going to penetrate my privacy.

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 31 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Someone should be asking what the sentence will be for kids who commit identity fraud and use someone else's ID to set up an account. It may flip the narrative to point out they are intentionally creating more criminal acts that will get kids in trouble with the law and possibly ruin lives.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Ushmel@lemmy.world 16 points 21 hours ago

It's about making LGBTQ content "adult only" and using this same mechanism to enforce ID law on that content. They've been doing it in some USA states for a few years now. No one wants to be the Porn Politician that votes against it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Armand1@lemmy.world 47 points 23 hours ago

If your kid has half a brain he'll do what we did as kids when porn sites were blocked on the home WiFi: He'll just get a VPN.

And when VPN websites were blocked on the home WiFi, we'd just download their apps on mobile data.

Where there's a will, there's a way.

Better to educate your kids on their natural urges and letting them use the more moderated sites than have them go down the more dodgy rabbitholes. No kink shaming but some of the things people do are nasty.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 56 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I'm disappointed that Pornhub is apparently capitulating instead of blocking access entirely in protest, like they've done in other jurisdictions.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ieatpwns@lemmy.world 34 points 23 hours ago

VPN subs will be up and UK viewership will be nonexistent

[–] TheLeadenSea@sh.itjust.works 38 points 1 day ago

So people too young or too privacy conscious to use those major platforms will move to nicher porn sites. Doesn't sound like a bad idea at all... /s

[–] MetalMachine@feddit.nl -5 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

People are not gonna agree with me but, it makes sense to have age verification just like you have to verify your age for tobacco or alcohol.

[–] Maxxie@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

Is there a paper linking gooning to cancer, why would you compare those things

[–] daggermoon@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago

I love this comment. Thank you!

[–] RepleteLocum@lemmy.blahaj.zone -1 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

I don’t agree with him, but there are certainly health issues stemming from porn consumption.
Be it ed, or a mental health issue.

[–] Maxxie@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 4 hours ago

In what world is that risk comparable to cigarettes?

Even comparing it to junk food is a stretch, and nobody suggests we put age verification on chips.

[–] daggermoon@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

My mental health is going to be equally fucked with or without porn. As for ED, I'm the only person I need to please so as the Aussies say; she'll be right.

[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 9 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Would it make sense for alcohol age verification if every household had beer taps installed? Because thats what internet is.

[–] MetalMachine@feddit.nl -3 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

Its certainly the parents responsibility to make sure those kids dont drink. And if they do, there should be repercussions just like we have the same expectations with Gun use.

But it's disanalgous anyways. We make stores and establishments check for IDs. These websites are no different from these establishments, therefore they should also verify the age.

[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Its disingenuous to compare information flow to physical markets. They're not the same thing.

[–] MetalMachine@feddit.nl -3 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah porn is definitely just "information flow", there's nothing beyond it and it can't affect minor individuals. Really? That's not disingenuous? So online gambling shouldn't be age restricted? There's no "physical" aspect to it.

Oh let's not forget, it certainly doesn't objectify women.

[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

I mean it literally is just information flow - no? Doesn't mean it can't be harmful or dangerous but thats what it is and you equating to actions like gambling just show how's actually ignorant you are being here. Have a good day and don't reply to me thanks.

load more comments
view more: next ›