And when this measure fails to protect children and, instead, becomes a data security nightmare, another scheme will be proposed to further erode the freedoms the web brings.
I look forward to hearing about the workarounds kids find.
this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2025
165 points (98.2% liked)
Technology
71922 readers
3453 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Do we know how the age verification process is gonna work or is this gonna be one of those neoliberal dystopian spystate kinda deals where the means of data collection is left to corporations only to be subsequently tapped by the state when the want to target individuals?
You just have to scan the qr code they tattoo on your balls
I mean some people might be into that.
Well it's been monitored by ofcom who we all know are the last word in inefficiency, corruption, and stupidity so I'm going to go ahead and guess that they're just going to say they're doing checks, and Ofcom just not going to check.
They're probably going to add a second pop-up after the "are you 18" pop-up that says "are you lying".
I would imagine they've at least talked about trying get people to enter credit card details. I know that's been pushed before, as early as the 2000s, for age verification on some sites. Obviously it's terrible for privacy, data breaches and flat-out fake sites just harvesting card numbers or taking all your cash at point of verification.
Not to mention that zillions of underage kids have their own legit cards nowadays.
Plus loads of adults don't have a card. It's not like when you turn 18 somebody from the government turns up and goes here's a bank account.
This is why they keep going on about government ID cards. So they can track everyone reliably. Which is precisely why we shouldn't do it.
I wonder what a fake beard or mustache does as far as fooling the machine goes?
So all of the mainstream porn will be blocked, leaving all of the niche and special-interest stuff available? Excellent, excellent...
Interestingly there are noticeable absences from that list.
Perhaps that's by design, there's no reason the politicians would make their own lives more difficult.
If UK really wanted to protect the kids, they would've jailed Transphobe JK Rowings for hate crime
The UK is transphobic too though.
You mean the land mass? Just a load of bigoted rocks.
Oh no. Some hackers hacked out database and released all the ID information on high profile people. Oh such whoopsie, we made.
- Adult Websites
I'm sure the most rigorous of data safety standards will be followed. After all they're being forced to do this I'm sure they won't take the cheapest possible route. Oh definitely not.
Depends entirely on how it's implemented, because the website doesn't need to know who you are, only verify that you are over 18. Which can be done reasonably securely - you generate a random ID on a secure service (e.g here in Finland, we use our online banking stuff for official verification purposes), give that ID to the website, and the only communication between the two of them is "Is id 123 valid and an adult? Yes/No".
Now, if that "secure service", most likely a government contract done as cheaply as possible turns out not to be, and they keep logs linking those IDs to the URLs requesting verification, then the entire thing goes belly up.
Zero Knowledge is more secure. Government signs a credential confirming date of birth and gives that to the citizen.
Citizen can then use that to create a proof they were born before date X. Verifier only sees the proof and the Government signature.
No need to trust 3rd party websites.
I was basically after that same concept - create that credential, and have the website only verify it's legit and nothing else.
I think my example of how it's currently done for basically everything in Finland just confused people, I wasn't suggesting every country implements adult age checks with their banks.
The problem there is that requires the government to do some of the work, and they don't want to. They want to sell this to the public as them being tough, but they definitely don't want it to cost any money.
This will be implemented in the most sketchy short-sighted way possible, I guarantee it
I would never touch any of these telemetry websites anymore because this is definitely going to be used to fingerprint you.
So your bank now knows you accessed certain websites. And likely one or more middleware services. And you are okay with that?
Was an example of the security, not who is running the service. But I mean, guess who knows if you pay for OnlyFans or stuff like that?
Your bank.
And like I said, it's only really secure if the service doesn't keep a database of logs connecting the two.
The bank doesn't know what people pay for, or who it goes to, they just know what account you paid into. They would have to go through and verify who owns the account and that's not an automatic process. Finding out the actual person or company behind an account requires effort, so unless there's some investigation that involves that bank account, they won't have that information.
🤡🤡🤡Lmao what? The amount of men calling up for some transaction error and I need to bring their account up and we can see EVERYTHING, the tinder premium subscriptions, the balding pills, the only fans. There's full access to the whole bank statements up until the account creation at the click of a button
There's been countless cases of bank tellers being fired for looking up their friends and exes to look up what is in their banks
No, come on, don't be disingenuous, you know that's not what I meant.
If I pay something to, Acme financial services LLC, you have no idea what that really is. They could make boxes, sports equipment, that could be an escort agency, you don't know. Pretty much every adult store is not going to have Sex Toys R Us, as their account name.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Garbage. This info will be weaponized by anyone who is willing to buy it.
Absolutely. Super easy to use this in blackmail. Especially in a country as repressed as the UK.
“PrOtEcT ThE ChiLdReN! 👆🏻🥴”
I can not hear that anymore!
Children need awareness, rather than shielding, concealment and tabooing.
load more comments
(4 replies)
mastodon has porn and you don't even need an account to use search. also, this will just drive people to use sketchy sites that won't follow the rules.
You can literally find porn on search engines. Google images is a bit restrictive but Bing, Duckduckgo etc will straight up show porn in the image or video searches.
So much for being better than the US. Welcome to the downfall of modern society UK.
load more comments
(2 replies)
This feel strangely like it has little to do with actually protecting kids...
It's more about penetrating your privacy but think of the children is the go-to argument to sugar-coat that.
Well they should at least give me a reach around if they are going to penetrate my privacy.
load more comments
(5 replies)
load more comments
(2 replies)
view more: next ›